David Wilson or 3.1? (poll)

[Ridleyman]

Hey guys,
This is a 10 team superflex league with info in signature. I have David Wilson, and am wondering with some of the optimism coming out about his recovery if you think it would be wise to trade him away for the 3.1 (the 21st pick of draft) I don't think I have a lot of holes on my team, and I already have 3 1st round picks. I guess I'm basically thinking is this realistically the peak value for Wilson? This draft is deep, it's a Superflex league, and it will include any free agents not currently on teams (Legarrett Blount, Marquise Goodwin, Knile Davis, ect.), and with some of the newbies in my league, I think there will be some solid prospects available at 3.1.

Thoughts?

[schiewerma21]

Deep draft but I'm not sure it's 25 players deep. I see a pretty solid 16-18 guys that I would all love to draft but after that blah.

David Wilson could be nothing but I definately take him over 3.01.

If you want a pick that I consider even to Wilson... I own the 2.07 in a league I would likely do that 1 for 1 for David Wilson.

[MEuRaH]

I'd rather take the chance on Wilson. I think the probability of nailing the 3.01 is worse than Wilson recovering.

[Ridleyman]

I kind of feel like we're talking semantics when saying you'd give up the 2.07 in a 12team non-QB flex league but wouldn't give up the 3.1 in a 10team QB flex league. To me, those are practically the same thing. If you take those 16-18 guys and then throw in 5 QB's you're at 21-23 guys, and 3.1 would be the 21st guy. You know what I mean?

[Csl312]

As this is a 10 team and a superflex, and I think there is a greater chance Wilson never plays again than that he becomes a startable fantasy player - I would probably try to get a little more for Wilson, but would not blame you for taking it.