1.04 in a 1 QB. Rome/Bowers or Caleb?

[Randomguess]

I have Stroud and Minshew at QB right now. I will have solid depth at WR and RB and have Laporta. Would you use the 1.04 on Rome or Bowers? Or solidify the QB position with Caleb?

[TheTroll]

1 QB with Stroud? for sure BPA which means a WR

[frerichs5]

Personally there’s no chance I take Caleb there in 1QB.

Rome I’d be ecstatic with there.

Bowers…eh…no TEP I assume since you didn’t mention it? I’d probably try to trade if possible, but would settle on Bowers if I couldn’t get anything decent.

[Randomguess]

Personally there’s no chance I take Caleb there in 1QB.

Rome I’d be ecstatic with there.

Bowers…eh…no TEP I assume since you didn’t mention it? I’d probably try to trade if possible, but would settle on Bowers if I couldn’t get anything decent.

I agree. I have the first two picks as well, so if I walk away with MHJ, Nabers and Rome I think I'd be set at WR.

[CGW]

I'd expect MHJ, nabers, and Odunze to be gone at 1.04 in a 1QB.

[BigBawseRoss]

rome wont be there. im taking wr4 of the class there which is likely BTJ

[Menace2010]

rome wont be there. im taking wr4 of the class there which is likely BTJ

This. Either BTJ or trade back. No need to blow this pick on a back-up QB. And just don't like TEs that early.

[murphysxm]

You would be lucky to get Rome. I would take BPA and that is too early for a TE for me

[Black Adam]

Taking Bowers.

[CGW]

Also, assuming the top 3 WRs will be gone (they should be), who could you trade the 1.04 for? That pick could be a nice trade piece to upgrade elsewhere.

[Mtt33]

Sprinting the odunze pick in if he’s there. If not, assuming bowers gets the draft capital we project he’s a pretty easy pick for me at 4.

[tstafford]

Not CW. Other than that, don't know yet. Need to see draft.

[slaughterrt]

Bowers is as much WR as he is TE. Depending on landing spot, he could be a cheat code.

[SoftwoodGrampian]

Not CW. Other than that, don't know yet. Need to see draft.

This