Mims or 2.01

[CGW]

12TM SF PPR
Rebuilding

Give 2.01 for Mims or hold for a potential RB when I flip to competing next year?

[Buckhill Bombers]

in a SF I take the 2.1, even though I do like what Mims has shown.

[Gator Sens]

I would take the 2.01 in SF. Mims looks solid but WRs in that range are easy to come by.

[Tvols]

mims

[Anteaters]

I'd rather have the 2.01 in SF. Mims is okay in the sense that he's not a bust, but he's also not going to be a stud. You might as well throw your dart for a player with a higher ceiling in the '24 draft.

[CGW]

I'd rather have the 2.01 in SF. Mims is okay in the sense that he's not a bust, but he's also not going to be a stud. You might as well throw your dart for a player with a higher ceiling in the '24 draft.

Do we know that? He's getting WR2-3 numbers so far with very limited snap counts.

[Anteaters]

I'd rather have the 2.01 in SF. Mims is okay in the sense that he's not a bust, but he's also not going to be a stud. You might as well throw your dart for a player with a higher ceiling in the '24 draft.

Do we know that? He's getting WR2-3 numbers so far with very limited snap counts.

I'm certain of it, but I may be standing on an island with that opinion.

[Trevormortis]

2.01 in SF for me

[ButtFumbleCity]

I'd rather have the 2.01 in SF. Mims is okay in the sense that he's not a bust, but he's also not going to be a stud. You might as well throw your dart for a player with a higher ceiling in the '24 draft.

Do we know that? He's getting WR2-3 numbers so far with very limited snap counts.

I'm certain of it, but I may be standing on an island with that opinion.

What makes you certain of it?

[Anteaters]

Do we know that? He's getting WR2-3 numbers so far with very limited snap counts.

I'm certain of it, but I may be standing on an island with that opinion.

What makes you certain of it?

For one thing, that Mims has been deemed worthy by his coaches of only "limited snap counts." That indicates to me that his coaches see limitations in his game. On a team as needy for talent as Denver, if Mims was stud-level talent, the coaches would have him on the field as much as possible. They see "good player", not "great player."

There are rookies all over the league that have been thrust into a heavy role early in the season. Denver coaches say to Mims, "You ain't that guy."

[CGW]

I'm certain of it, but I may be standing on an island with that opinion.

What makes you certain of it?

For one thing, that Mims has been deemed worthy by his coaches of only "limited snap counts." That indicates to me that his coaches see limitations in his game. On a team as needy for talent as Denver, if Mims was stud-level talent, the coaches would have him on the field as much as possible. They see "good player", not "great player."

There are rookies all over the league that have been thrust into a heavy role early in the season. Denver coaches say to Mims, "You ain't that guy."

So no rookie ever becomes a stud after seeing low snaps early on? I bet I could find some examples pretty quick of when that is just not true. Off the top of my head, Amon Ra St Brown was on a Lions team that had literally no1 (quintex cephas was running as the #1), but didn't find the field until the back half.

[Anteaters]

What makes you certain of it?

For one thing, that Mims has been deemed worthy by his coaches of only "limited snap counts." That indicates to me that his coaches see limitations in his game. On a team as needy for talent as Denver, if Mims was stud-level talent, the coaches would have him on the field as much as possible. They see "good player", not "great player."

There are rookies all over the league that have been thrust into a heavy role early in the season. Denver coaches say to Mims, "You ain't that guy."

So no rookie ever becomes a stud after seeing low snaps early on? I bet I could find some examples pretty quick of when that is just not true. Off the top of my head, Amon Ra St Brown was on a Lions team that had literally no1 (quintex cephas was running as the #1), but didn't find the field until the back half.

I'm not saying it can't ever happen. Anything is possible. It's just my opinion that Mims is not going to become a fantasy stud, based on my predraft opinion and the way his coaches have chosen to use him so far.

If you're a believer in his stud-dom, I think you should hold him where you have him and trade for him where you don't have him.

[TheTroll]

For one thing, that Mims has been deemed worthy by his coaches of only "limited snap counts." That indicates to me that his coaches see limitations in his game. On a team as needy for talent as Denver, if Mims was stud-level talent, the coaches would have him on the field as much as possible. They see "good player", not "great player."

There are rookies all over the league that have been thrust into a heavy role early in the season. Denver coaches say to Mims, "You ain't that guy."

So no rookie ever becomes a stud after seeing low snaps early on? I bet I could find some examples pretty quick of when that is just not true. Off the top of my head, Amon Ra St Brown was on a Lions team that had literally no1 (quintex cephas was running as the #1), but didn't find the field until the back half.

I'm not saying it can't ever happen. Anything is possible. It's just my opinion that Mims is not going to become a fantasy stud, based on my predraft opinion and the way his coaches have chosen to use him so far.

If you're a believer in his stud-dom, I think you should hold him where you have him and trade for him where you don't have him.

We have a great prospect on a floundering team. So it’s a gamble. Do you value the player more or the situation?

[Anteaters]

We have a great prospect on a floundering team. So it’s a gamble. Do you value the player more or the situation?

I account for talent and situation.

On the situation part of the equation, we have
1) Sutton + Jeudy continue to be utilized more than Mims, and Jeudy is seen as having a "future" with the team.
2) The QB situation is not great and is not likely to improve next year.
3) Mims is not currently being given a huge opportunity by the coaches.

If those things were different ... say Mims had Hebert as QB, the WR2 for his team was out for the season, and the coaches were giving him 85% snap rate. If that was the situation, and Mimis was producing good stats right now, I'd be a little higher on Mims. But none of that is the situation, so I'm still lukewarm on his ceiling.

I think Mims can be a very good real life player. It's only his fantasy production that I doubt.

[TheTroll]

We have a great prospect on a floundering team. So it’s a gamble. Do you value the player more or the situation?

I account for talent and situation.

On the situation part of the equation, we have
1) Sutton + Jeudy continue to be utilized more than Mims, and Jeudy is seen as having a "future" with the team.
2) The QB situation is not great and is not likely to improve next year.
3) Mims is not currently being given a huge opportunity by the coaches.

If those things were different ... say Mims had Hebert as QB, the WR2 for his team was out for the season, and the coaches were giving him 85% snap rate. If that was the situation, and Mimis was producing good stats right now, I'd be a little higher on Mims. But none of that is the situation, so I'm still lukewarm on his ceiling.

I think Mims can be a very good real life player. It's only his fantasy production that I doubt.

Oh I agree, I was just putting it out there that Mims can be a great WR at some point. Someone I would invest in if I was rebuilding.