SuperFlex or 2QB

[jmul9]

Can you do a 2QB or Superflex 14 team league?

I ask the question because sometimes on weeks there is 6 teams who have bye weeks. The teams that can't start a QB just take a huge hit by starting a running back or wr?

[Madadamus]

I think SuperFlex is the better format. You have more flexibility and teams can build there teams around other positions and still have a strong team.

[Phaded]

Superflex is the better option overall in my opinion.

That way people will not get screwed having to start nobody in their 2QB slot and provides flexibility.

[Snake]

My main/favorite league is a 12 team, 2QB. It's definitely thin during 6 team bye weeks, which I actually like. It definitely drives a few trades with teams wanting a QB3.

For 14, I think you'all need to do a superflex..

[Nanananananana]

Superflex is awesome but 14 teams might be annoying with only 32 qbs. 10-12 really is the sweet spot.

[TheChicken]

In a 12 team superflex league I play, a team lost two starting QBs to injury just before the season got underway. Everyone had them tagged to finish bottom and earn the 1.01, yet they won 7 games. If you get the scoring and line up requirements correct a 14 team Superflex is workable. I would suggest a maximum of 8 starters, 4pts passing TD & 1pt per 25 yards passing. A 2QB 14 team league is too difficult to construct a roster in a dynasty format (redraft would be fine as you'd know the bye weeks and wouldn't be tied to QBs for more than a season).

[Space Cowboy]

I've done 10 team 2 QB and it's great. 12 team would be a tight squeeze but do-able. 14 is out of the question, has to be superflex.

[slaughterrt]

12 team 2QB is not out of the question. 14 team 2QB isn't either. I play in a 16 team 2QB league and it's definitely my most active league in terms of waivers and trades. With only 32 starting QBs at any given time, of course it's not easy for each team to have two starting QBs, especially when bye weeks and injuries start happening. However, this definitely increases the value of QBs, and backups and prospects...which in turn means more trading. Veterans who are on their way out are still valuable, and so are 3rd string rookies. Teams aren't totally crippled by having only one starting QB, but are certainly more competitive with two or more. It's definitely a bit different than your 1QB leagues as teams tend to build around QBs (for obvious reasons), but this at least gives QBs the value they deserve (and the value they have in the NFL).