Did their OL fall apart? I don't follow DAL closely. I mean, I know Zeke and Pollard aren't there any longer. A quick google tells me their OL has indeed fallen off, oops, didn't see that.Bronco Billy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 9:48 amHow many holes does history open?wickerkat1212 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 9:46 amWell, historically they have a great OL and RBs do well there—Zeke, Pollard, etc. That's my take.Bronco Billy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 9:32 am Why is DAL considered such a great spot for a rookie RB to land? They were hardly a great running team last season and had massive losses of talent in their O line this past offseason with no meaningful replacement. There’s a wide open backfield with lots of opportunity for carries, but those look like they’re going to be seriously low quality opportunities to me, and they’re also looking to be throwing more (read fewer rushing attempts) because they lost a lot of talent overall in the +/- of FA.
I can think of at least 6 situations immediately that I’d rather see a rookie RB go to. By God, if Brooks goes to DAL we’re looking at almost a perfect match made in Hell.
Sorry, that’s pretty snarky. But do FFers seriously ignore offseason action this badly?
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/400 ... nsive-line