OTC - Lance, Chase, Etienne, Pitts or trade back?

[Niceguy]

I am OTC at 1.03 for team 2 in sig. Superflex league.

I am stacked at WR but my RB core is holding me back. My QBs are passable and I'm weak at TE.

Najee went off the board unexpectedly at 1.02. Lawrence went 1.01.

Would you take Lance, Chase, Etienne or Pitts? Or would you do a trade back to 1.06? I was offered 1.06 plus Higbee for 1.03. I know it's light, but I'm planning to counter.

My thought is that I'm torn on the players available at 1.03, so if I trade back to 1.06 I can add some value and still come away with a player that I'm very excited about.

[Needalife]

Pitts or Chase here over a trade back IMO. Although, I’d be tempted to move some of that WR depth to get back in for Etienne or Javonte.

[Niceguy]

Pitts or Chase here over a trade back IMO. Although, I’d be tempted to move some of that WR depth to get back in for Etienne or Javonte.

Thanks for the advice. So you feel good enough about my QBs to use the pick at a different position then?

[Gator Sens]

Lance or Chase look great here. With your QBs being passable in SF, I think Lance is the way to go. The 10 team format makes it close for Chase though.

[FantasyFreak]

Don't think you can compete this year with those RB's in a ten teamer. I think you should be trying to move some of that WR depth for RB's if you can. I'd take Lance, Pitts, or Chase and trade for a RB, as I don't believe the RB's this year are good prospects vs the other top guys at other positions, like Pitts, Chase etc.

[Niceguy]

Update, was just offered Kittle in exchange for 1.03 and OBJ. Worth taking or just make the pick?

I was leaning Lance already and these comments have pushed me that way more now.

[abloom]

I am OTC at 1.03 for team 2 in sig. Superflex league.

I am stacked at WR but my RB core is holding me back. My QBs are passable and I'm weak at TE.

Najee went off the board unexpectedly at 1.02. Lawrence went 1.01.

Would you take Lance, Chase, Etienne or Pitts? Or would you do a trade back to 1.06? I was offered 1.06 plus Higbee for 1.03. I know it's light, but I'm planning to counter.

My thought is that I'm torn on the players available at 1.03, so if I trade back to 1.06 I can add some value and still come away with a player that I'm very excited about.

I'm not sure why you say Najee was unexpected at 1.02. The surprising pick here is that Lawrence went 1.01. I'd go Chase.

[Niceguy]

I am OTC at 1.03 for team 2 in sig. Superflex league.

I am stacked at WR but my RB core is holding me back. My QBs are passable and I'm weak at TE.

Najee went off the board unexpectedly at 1.02. Lawrence went 1.01.

Would you take Lance, Chase, Etienne or Pitts? Or would you do a trade back to 1.06? I was offered 1.06 plus Higbee for 1.03. I know it's light, but I'm planning to counter.

My thought is that I'm torn on the players available at 1.03, so if I trade back to 1.06 I can add some value and still come away with a player that I'm very excited about.

I'm not sure why you say Najee was unexpected at 1.02. The surprising pick here is that Lawrence went 1.01. I'd go Chase.

It was unexpected because of the guy's roster. He has only Hurts and Fitzpatrick at QB and has C-Mac and Miles Sanders.

[Niceguy]

Update, I ended up taking Lance. Was super tempted to take Chase, but I have the top three dynasty WRs followed by three more in the top 20. I just couldn't justify ignoring my aging QB core to add even more strength at WR.

Also, WRs aren't getting the trade value they should in this league.

Thanks for the tips everyone.

[abloom]

Update, I ended up taking Lance. Was super tempted to take Chase, but I have the top three dynasty WRs followed by three more in the top 20. I just couldn't justify ignoring my aging QB core to add even more strength at WR.

Also, WRs aren't getting the trade value they should in this league.

Thanks for the tips everyone.

should have traded back then. you and a few others in your league are over valuing qbs