"In 2014 Tyreek was paying a lawyer to defend him, once Tyreek’s money ran out, they gave him a public defender. It isn’t too hard to believe why he would decide to take a plea. 3 year probation and your record will be expunged or risk going to jail for 10 years with a public defender, seems a pretty easy choice. I think it is more puzzling why a DA would offer probation and a clean record for what he was being charged with, that doesn’t make any sense." -your quoteusps33 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:44 pmJust giving Hill the benefit of the doubt, and expressing my opinion, what in the world is wrong with you?FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:36 pmWhat in depth research have you done, exactly? Legitimately curious, since you are part of this trio insinuating Hill's innocence of anything, including his 2014 stuff. We all have Google. Have some ticket stubs to the KC airport? Did some groundbreaking detective work? Seeing as you didn't use the "media", care to reference your personal sources? Seems like anything other than Florio (an ex lawyer) is not media, in your eyes.usps33 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:34 pm
I blame the media the most, for instance the people who follow Mike Florio without doing any in-depth research of their own are never going to give Tyreek the benefit of the doubt. Me personally, I almost dropped Tyreek from my roster when that TV station first released that audio. If it wasn’t the off-season I would have dropped him, wouldn’t have even bothered to try and trade him away. Luckily I have the time to do some deep researching, maybe some of the other posters don’t have the time and just take what the media feeds them.
I anxiously waiting to hear what comes from those “text messages” that Tyreek lawyers sent to the NFL along with the other information they sent.
Audio comes out of Hill saying something about not doing anything to her, and you pull this out. The insinuation is pretty clear. The benefit of the doubt is not warranted in the case of Hill abuse of Espinal, at this point. You are insinuating with this remark, that is the case. If that is not what you meant, then clarify your statement, and I will clarify mine, along with it. Are we talking about child abuse, or the abuse of Espinal in 2014? That is where this thread is heading. I tried to say people should tread carefully on that matter, some have not, and I feel I have no choice but to respond back. That's what a few other people have already basically fully stated, and you have been adding to those comments.