Dynasty League Football Forum

It's the lawyer in me - I can't help but push the limits on trades. I usually do it informally though without outright rejecting the initial offer. I'll say something like - "we are close, but I think if you did X - I could agree right now." sometimes they'll just agree - other times they'...

You're not so deep that you can give up Rice. Try to draft at wr, maybe even see if someone will bite on hunter for a similarly situated young wr prospect.

I would accept this. That being said - its always worth seeing if you can grab more out of the deal. See if you can push the 2013 2nd to a 2013 first. Emphasize the huge value of the 1.2 that you are giving up and that Charles was a top five pick just a year ago. See what he says.

Horrible offer. Rice is a known commodity - Richardson isn't. If anything, I would try to trade rice for two proven young wideouts. It is also hard to fully comment without knowing your rb situation.

I don't like this offer. If (a big if I know) Stewart ever gets a backfield to himself you'll regret trading him. Im not a believer in Flynn. I think Stewart, because of his upside, is more valuable than Austin.

Test the market for the 1.2 and/or rivers and see what kind of runningbacks are available in exchange. The 1.2 might bring you back a stud running back and a draft pick in a two qb league.

With Rivers on your team as your second qb it's a no-brainer to me.

Rodgers is a proven stud - in fact proven top 1-3 producer at his position for the next 5-6 years. Luck RGIII and TRich are all great to get - but all unproven. If anyone would even consider not trading any of them for Rodgers, (unless you already have Cam, Brady, Brees, or Stafford), I think you ar...

I would give even more than that for Rodgers in a two qb league. He's extremely valuable.

Value wise I think you are giving up alot and losing on the deal. However, I'm of the mindset that sometimes you make a trade that makes your team better even if you lose on value. Right now, your team looks solid and ready to compete . If you think Nicks gives you the edge you need other the other ...

I agree as well that you are getting better value - but need the rb more. Perhaps you can see if he will also swap one of your wr for a rb? Since he devalues Britt so much - it's hard to pass up taking advantage of that. Or I would try to get another team to commit to trading you a running back for ...

The order for 2013 will be determined based on each team's 2012 finish. Right now I hold my team's 2013 (likely to be a late first round pick (I won last year and have a solid team for this year)); and two other 2013 picks that could really range anywhere from #1 to #9. I had the 1.2 (via trade), bu...

Matthews - he has to the team all to himself. Forte will have some challenge from Bush, also, he is very unhappy. There is a chance he won't be with the bears in a year or two. Not sure if he has the same success on a team that doesn't rely on him as much as the Bears do (this coming from a Bears fa...

It's close, but I wouldn't take it. With Rodgers, Green and Graham you'll have a solid core for at least 5-6 years. If you are looking to upgrade RBush - I think you can do this differently (through the draft). I would rather have Green than Fitz with your team makeup.

I am in a ten team two quarterback league and I would like to hear opinions on what I should focus on in terms of keeping the team strong in the future. In particular, I managed to accumulate three 2013 first round picks (order to be determined) by developing and trading young players. So any advice...