Tier up from R White to Barkley?

[Randomguess]

12 man league, PPR, start min 2 RB, max 3.
My other RBs are Bijan, Etienne, Spears and Zamir White.
I think in PPR Rachaad is still a solid back. I don't know if he will hold value throughout this season or beyond. Barkley is two years older but now gets to run behind a better line and has a better offense. Hurts may vulture goal line TDs and may not check down to Barkley a ton. With the RBs that I have, would you try and go for Barkley? I tried to go for Hall and Gibbs, but neither owner is selling them.

[Menace2010]

Depends on the cost. Not sure it's something you need to do, you have plenty of RB depth and quality starters. What's your situation at WR? Could see making a White for WR play as opposed to tiering up at RB with Bijan and Etienne in the 1 and 2 slots.

[Randomguess]

Depends on the cost. Not sure it's something you need to do, you have plenty of RB depth and quality starters. What's your situation at WR? Could see making a White for WR play as opposed to tiering up at RB with Bijan and Etienne in the 1 and 2 slots.

Pretty set at WR.
Full team (not RBs)
QB: Stroud, Minshew
WR: Lamb, Nacua, Olave, D Smith
TE: Laporta, Ferguson
Have 1.01, 1.02, 1.04. So likely MHJ, Nabers, Bowers or Brooks. The more I watch tape on Brooks the comfortable I feel taking him at 1.04.

[Menace2010]

I'd wait until in season. Team is stacked. No tinkering necessary at the moment. If you can move White and a 2nd for Barkley, sure, otherwise not moving any of those WRs nor early 1sts to get a deal done, so not sure what you'd be able to add.

[Randomguess]

I'd wait until in season. Team is stacked. No tinkering necessary at the moment. If you can move White and a 2nd for Barkley, sure, otherwise not moving any of those WRs nor early 1sts to get a deal done, so not sure what you'd be able to add.

Sounds good. Appreciate it.

[BHSU]

Depends on the cost. Not sure it's something you need to do, you have plenty of RB depth and quality starters. What's your situation at WR? Could see making a White for WR play as opposed to tiering up at RB with Bijan and Etienne in the 1 and 2 slots.

Pretty set at WR.
Full team (not RBs)
QB: Stroud, Minshew
WR: Lamb, Nacua, Olave, D Smith
TE: Laporta, Ferguson
Have 1.01, 1.02, 1.04. So likely MHJ, Nabers, Bowers or Brooks. The more I watch tape on Brooks the comfortable I feel taking him at 1.04.

Your team is absolutely loaded. I think when off-season hits and the team looks as good as yours does, people just start getting bored and trading just to trade which actually ends up hurting the team more than helping

[Randomguess]

Depends on the cost. Not sure it's something you need to do, you have plenty of RB depth and quality starters. What's your situation at WR? Could see making a White for WR play as opposed to tiering up at RB with Bijan and Etienne in the 1 and 2 slots.

Pretty set at WR.
Full team (not RBs)
QB: Stroud, Minshew
WR: Lamb, Nacua, Olave, D Smith
TE: Laporta, Ferguson
Have 1.01, 1.02, 1.04. So likely MHJ, Nabers, Bowers or Brooks. The more I watch tape on Brooks the comfortable I feel taking him at 1.04.

Your team is absolutely loaded. I think when off-season hits and the team looks as good as yours does, people just start getting bored and trading just to trade which actually ends up hurting the team more than helping

You are 100% correct. You think Brooks at 1.04 is reasonable? Consensus will say Bowers or a WR. But for my roster, I'll have my pick between Bowers and Brooks. I prefer the RB1 over the TE1.

[Black Adam]

Pretty set at WR.
Full team (not RBs)
QB: Stroud, Minshew
WR: Lamb, Nacua, Olave, D Smith
TE: Laporta, Ferguson
Have 1.01, 1.02, 1.04. So likely MHJ, Nabers, Bowers or Brooks. The more I watch tape on Brooks the comfortable I feel taking him at 1.04.

Your team is absolutely loaded. I think when off-season hits and the team looks as good as yours does, people just start getting bored and trading just to trade which actually ends up hurting the team more than helping

You are 100% correct. You think Brooks at 1.04 is reasonable? Consensus will say Bowers or a WR. But for my roster, I'll have my pick between Bowers and Brooks. I prefer the RB1 over the TE1.

Like I said in the other thread you made: No.

If anything, I'd take a QB at 1.04. If they hit, you could "pay" for your tiering up to Barkley and get something back as well. If that QB is Caleb and he hits, you could also hold him and be set at the position; he's obviously an upgrade over Minshew.

[NathanielWegman]

Your team is absolutely loaded. I think when off-season hits and the team looks as good as yours does, people just start getting bored and trading just to trade which actually ends up hurting the team more than helping

You are 100% correct. You think Brooks at 1.04 is reasonable? Consensus will say Bowers or a WR. But for my roster, I'll have my pick between Bowers and Brooks. I prefer the RB1 over the TE1.

Like I said in the other thread you made: No.

If anything, I'd take a QB at 1.04. If they hit, you could "pay" for your tiering up to Barkley and get something back as well. If that QB is Caleb and he hits, you could also hold him and be set at the position; he's obviously an upgrade over Minshew.

+1

[TheTroll]

I'd wait until in season. Team is stacked. No tinkering necessary at the moment. If you can move White and a 2nd for Barkley, sure, otherwise not moving any of those WRs nor early 1sts to get a deal done, so not sure what you'd be able to add.

This^^^^

[BHSU]

Pretty set at WR.
Full team (not RBs)
QB: Stroud, Minshew
WR: Lamb, Nacua, Olave, D Smith
TE: Laporta, Ferguson
Have 1.01, 1.02, 1.04. So likely MHJ, Nabers, Bowers or Brooks. The more I watch tape on Brooks the comfortable I feel taking him at 1.04.

Your team is absolutely loaded. I think when off-season hits and the team looks as good as yours does, people just start getting bored and trading just to trade which actually ends up hurting the team more than helping

You are 100% correct. You think Brooks at 1.04 is reasonable? Consensus will say Bowers or a WR. But for my roster, I'll have my pick between Bowers and Brooks. I prefer the RB1 over the TE1.

Do I think Bowers should be 1.4? No I do not. Do I think your pick would be better spent elsewhere? 100%. Heck, if you're dead set on Brooks just move down a few spots and get extra for it.