NEED QUICK RESPONSE: D. MARTIN FOR AJ GREEN

[dawgs4life]

TRADE IS D. MARTIN 1.9 & 2.3 FOR AJ GREEN 2.6 AND 2014 1ST ROUNDER(WILL PROBABLY BE LATE 1ST).....FAIR TRADE?
12 TEAM- 30 PLAYER ROSTER NON PPR.
LET ME KNOW WHAT U THINK AS I THINK IT IS A GOOD TRADE AND WANT TO ACCEPT BEFORE HE CHANGES HIS MIND.

[Seventy5]

WOULD DEPEND ON THE REST OF YOUR ROSTER. COULD GO EITHER WAY, BECAUSE BOTH ARE TOP 3-10 PICKS AND COULD ARGUABLY BE TAKEN BEFORE THE OTHER DEPENDING ON HOW ONE BUILDS THEIR TEAM.

[Seventy5]

What's the rest of your roster looking like?

[Drpowell727]

Need to see your roster, and what your needs are. Fair trade stud for stud but have no clue what your roster will look like after you make this move.


Qb cam newton
Rbs j Charles dougie shady k hunter b pierce
Wr d Bowe Gordon s rice s smith
Te gronk d Allen
Lb mayo Willis z brown
De m Williams dunervil
Cb j Jenkins e berry m Barron j Byrd
K b Walsh

[will6779]

According to there adp. It would seem fair as far as value goes. Greens first and martins 5th. Im a self admitted rb whore. I woukd want the pics to be in my favor. I value martin slightly more than green. All depends on preferance however

[dawgs4life]

think its a GOOD trade for me because have 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3
he is not asking for these....

rb- AP, b. pierce, b. brown, m. bush, r. helu
wr- fitz, a. roberts, aj jenkins, b. loydd

rest are roster fodder

[Drpowell727]

With your roster I would probably rather have Doug Martin and you can draft two recievers in the draft. Pretty solid with ap and dougie.

[bjorklunde]

I would take the Green side of the deal. Just based on the life of a WR compared to a RB you win out. Green will be dominate for 10 years, where Martin will be more like 5 (pure speculation on my part, just going off of past players).

[Seventy5]

I would take the Green side of the deal. Just based on the life of a WR compared to a RB you win out. Green will be dominate for 10 years, where Martin will be more like 5 (pure speculation on my part, just going off of past players).

I understand the whole shelf life theory, and that always becomes very polar in the offseason when points being scored don't matter, but IMO the shelf life difference is made up by the fact that WR goes 40-50 deep with good starters, while I start getting uncomfortable with RB's after the first 15 or so are off the board.

I'd take Martin here, but could understand someone preferring the WR. I'd just rather start Doug Martin/WR24 than AJG/RB24

[dawgs4life]

I would take the Green side of the deal. Just based on the life of a WR compared to a RB you win out. Green will be dominate for 10 years, where Martin will be more like 5 (pure speculation on my part, just going off of past players).

WAS WHAT I WAS THINKING

[MR ROURKE]

THE TRADE MAKES YOUR WR'S UNIMPRESSIVE.

[Team Tacos]

I LIKE DOUG MARTIN BETTER THAN AJ GREEN

[scarecrows15]

Follow your gut. The value is fair.

[dynastyninja]

This conversation in a nutshell:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pdWAcK6 ... detailpage

[IHaveAZombiePlan]

This conversation in a nutshell:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pdWAcK6 ... detailpage

First thing I started thinking about reading this thread, lol.