Trevor Lawrence vs Breece hall

[jponte3]

12 team startup superflex full ppr but 6 point passing tds. I feel like the value here is with Breece in most peoples eyes but just curious if anyone would consider taking Lawrence in this scenario with 6 point passing tds. Lawrence worries me but I also don’t love building around rbs .
Appreciate any feedback as always

[doctor d]

6pt passing TD makes it TLaw for me. And in a startup, it's probably worth it to insulate value with a young QB.

[collbey]

4 or 6 pts passing, TLaw.

[BabyChark23]

TLaw. And if this is your QB and RB situation in your signature, I would lean even more heavily toward TLaw.

[NathanielWegman]

Give me TLaw in a SF format alll day

[MacDaddy123]

I'm in a 14 team SF TEP startup right now.
TLaw went at 2.04 and Breece went at 2.11, so about a half round difference between them.

[Seventy5]

Trevor Lawrence easily in a SF start up. Would rather build around the QB.

I took TLaw at 2.03 in a start up last week, Hall went 2.05

Only way I can see this being Hall is if it was an established team loaded at QB with a need at RB and they were selling out to win.

[Easy Breesy]

TLAW in a SF format for sure

[Black Adam]

Breece.

[abloom]

12+ team SF non best ball it's Lawrence. Always Lawrence.

There are a few reasons for this

1) QBs are far more valuable in these formats than RBs
2) Lawrence is a non-committal pick in terms of compete now vs youth, breece is not. Breece is a compete now commitment. There is nothing wrong with a compete now build but it just locks you in to certain choices down the line.
3) it is far harder to get cheap QBs that are productive than cheap rbs that are productive

[TheTroll]

In SF the answer is simple…the QB