You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
- wickerkat1212
- Legend
- Posts: 6115
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:23 am
- Contact:
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
IIRC Downs had one of the lowest drop rates in this class?
Drop rates for top WR prospects in the 2023 NFL Draft:
1. Kayshon Boutte: 13.8%
2. Quentin Johnston: 8.5%
3. Marvin Mims: 7.9%
4. Rashee Rice: 7.8%
5. Jalin Hyatt: 6.7%
6. Jaxon Smith-Njigba: 4.8% (2021)
7. Zay Flowers: 4.4%
8. Jordan Addison: 3.1%
9. Josh Downs: 2%
Drop rates for top WR prospects in the 2023 NFL Draft:
1. Kayshon Boutte: 13.8%
2. Quentin Johnston: 8.5%
3. Marvin Mims: 7.9%
4. Rashee Rice: 7.8%
5. Jalin Hyatt: 6.7%
6. Jaxon Smith-Njigba: 4.8% (2021)
7. Zay Flowers: 4.4%
8. Jordan Addison: 3.1%
9. Josh Downs: 2%
D3:
QB—Allen, Pickett RB—Kamara, Jacobs, ZWhite, Edwards, Ford, Warren WR—Lamb, Olave, DJM, Puka, Tillman, Marshall, Jefferson, Robinson, Tucker TE—Ferguson, Schoon, Likely, Smith, Washington, Kraft PK—Prater DEF—BAL
D4:
QB—TLaw, JimmyG, Tannehill, AOC, Hall RB—Bijan, Kamara, Conner, BENSON (R), Gainwell, Gainwell, Foreman, ZMoss, Chandler, McLaughlin WR—Jefferson, Hill, Adams, Allen, POLK (R), CORLEY (R), COWING (R), Tillman, Woods TE—Kelce, Kmet, TJOHNSON (R), Conklin PK—Butker DEF—PIT
Superflex 1:
QB—Mahomes, Rodgers, Mayfield, RATTLER (R) RB—Bijan, Kamara, Allgeier, Mostert, BRob, ESTIME (R) WR—Chase, DJM, Devonta, MBrown, Lockett, Myers, COWING (R), MWASHINGTON (R) TE—Kmet, Kraft, SANDERS (R), Conklin, Hurst PK—Elliott DEF—PHI
Superflex 2:
QB: MAYE (R), Goff, Cousins, PENIX (R), Wentz, White; RB: Bijan, BRob, ZWhite, Allgeier, McLaughlin WR: HARRISON (R), DJM, Higgins, JSN, BTHOMAS (R), Downs, RMoore, Atwell, SMoore, DPJ, Devante TE: Ferguson, Kraft, Trautman, Tremble
QB—Allen, Pickett RB—Kamara, Jacobs, ZWhite, Edwards, Ford, Warren WR—Lamb, Olave, DJM, Puka, Tillman, Marshall, Jefferson, Robinson, Tucker TE—Ferguson, Schoon, Likely, Smith, Washington, Kraft PK—Prater DEF—BAL
D4:
QB—TLaw, JimmyG, Tannehill, AOC, Hall RB—Bijan, Kamara, Conner, BENSON (R), Gainwell, Gainwell, Foreman, ZMoss, Chandler, McLaughlin WR—Jefferson, Hill, Adams, Allen, POLK (R), CORLEY (R), COWING (R), Tillman, Woods TE—Kelce, Kmet, TJOHNSON (R), Conklin PK—Butker DEF—PIT
Superflex 1:
QB—Mahomes, Rodgers, Mayfield, RATTLER (R) RB—Bijan, Kamara, Allgeier, Mostert, BRob, ESTIME (R) WR—Chase, DJM, Devonta, MBrown, Lockett, Myers, COWING (R), MWASHINGTON (R) TE—Kmet, Kraft, SANDERS (R), Conklin, Hurst PK—Elliott DEF—PHI
Superflex 2:
QB: MAYE (R), Goff, Cousins, PENIX (R), Wentz, White; RB: Bijan, BRob, ZWhite, Allgeier, McLaughlin WR: HARRISON (R), DJM, Higgins, JSN, BTHOMAS (R), Downs, RMoore, Atwell, SMoore, DPJ, Devante TE: Ferguson, Kraft, Trautman, Tremble
- Dynasty DeLorean
- Degenerate
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
I strongly disagree, because Downs freelances his routes more than Flowers does, and “wastes” more movement than Flowers does. In the NFL, timing is critical. We saw it with Jeudy where his dancing around led to mis-timings with his qb. I’m not saying Downs is a bad route runner, if he’s on the same page as the offensive coordinator and qb then more power to him. But he’s not as efficiently consistent as Flowers, not in my opinion in anyway.Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 1:40 pmI had that as the biggest advantage for Downs over Flowers. To me, Downs was the better route runner and separator. I think he arguably has the best release packages in this class. His footwork is the best in this class to me. Also, better at catchpoint than Flowers.Dynasty DeLorean wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 1:22 pm I like Downs, I just have questions whether he can be a #1. And if he can’t, that’s ok. But then pivoting to a guy that can might be the move. Downs reminded me of a mini-Steve Smith coming out of college.
Flowers and Downs stats are very similar but I thought Flowers profiled more as a #1 than Downs. Flowers is bigger, stronger, faster, and a more consistent route runner.
Flowers no slouch with his route running though either and more proven as a winner on the outside and more dynamic I think with the ball in his hands. Flowers kind of reminds me of Diggs.
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 14396
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
I don't agree, but film is subjective and sometimes a matter of preference, so no big deal. I also still disagree that Jeudy dances in his routes, but that's another topic.Dynasty DeLorean wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 1:50 pm
I strongly disagree, because Downs freelances his routes more than Flowers does, and “wastes” more movement than Flowers does. In the NFL, timing is critical. We saw it with Jeudy where his dancing around led to mis-timings with his qb. I’m not saying Downs is a bad route runner, if he’s on the same page as the offensive coordinator and qb then more power to him. But he’s not as efficiently consistent as Flowers, not in my opinion in anyway.
I don't think Downs dances around in his routes. His releases off the line are very purposeful and most importantly, they're effective. They've translated exactly to the NFL 1:1. The touchdown against Jacksonville a few weeks back was very similar to one of the routes I had in the OP.
I guess it just depends on what you prefer in a route runner, but Downs is winning very consistently right now and hasn't changed his style.
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
Downs and Flowers are both great route runners. I do agree that Flowers has more of a WR1 skillset, but I think Downs can be very productive as a WR2.
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 1:09 pm
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
Downs is what we wanted Elijah Moore to actually be.
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
Guess long term to me. Downs ceiling is Tyler Lockett, but with AR throwing him the ball along with Michael Pittman, not sure Downs ever is more than a low end WR2, high end WR3. Nice piece, but capped upside in that Indy offense.
If debating versus Zay Flowers, I like Flowers more in Baltimore, since competing with just Andrews and not really anyone else
Downs is competing with Pittman and paired with Richardson, who despite physical skills, not as sold on for real football as a passer, not just a weapon. Minshew obviously limited but already far better passer than AR.
If debating versus Zay Flowers, I like Flowers more in Baltimore, since competing with just Andrews and not really anyone else
Downs is competing with Pittman and paired with Richardson, who despite physical skills, not as sold on for real football as a passer, not just a weapon. Minshew obviously limited but already far better passer than AR.
Team 1- Friday Night Lights
12 tm dynasty PPR, TE premiumQB/2RB/2WR/TE/3FLEX/K/D
http://www63.myfantasyleague.com/2017/home/14805#0
QB: Mahomes/Mayfield/Levis
RB: Jonathan Taylor/Singletary/Allgier/Ty Chandler/Bigsby/AGibson
WR: Garret Wilson/Nico Collins/Diontae Johnson/Mi Williams/Marquise Brown/Zay Flowers
TE: Goeddert/Njoku/Ferguson/Harrison Bryant
Team 2 - Good Life
12 tm dynasty PPR, TE premiumQB/2RB/2WR/TE/2FLEX/K/D
http://www64.myfantasyleague.com/2017/home/58823#0
QB: Josh Allen/Dobbs
RB: Jon Taylor/Roschon Johnson/JK Dobbins/Ty Chandler
WR: Diggs/Lockett/Diontae Johnson/Pittman/Elijah Moore/Jayden Reed/Wandale Robinson
TE: Ferguson/Okwonkwo/Juwan Johnson/Tucker Kraft/Ruckert
Team 3 - WFL
12 tm dynasty superflex, PPR, 26 man roster salary cap - no K/DST
QB: Fields/TLawrence/Zach Wilson/Mills
RB: Gibson/Chandler
WR: ACooper/Lockett/Godwin/Rashee Rice/Josh Downs/Mingo/Elijah Moore/WRobinson
TE: Goeddert/Trautman/Brevin Jordan
12 tm dynasty PPR, TE premiumQB/2RB/2WR/TE/3FLEX/K/D
http://www63.myfantasyleague.com/2017/home/14805#0
QB: Mahomes/Mayfield/Levis
RB: Jonathan Taylor/Singletary/Allgier/Ty Chandler/Bigsby/AGibson
WR: Garret Wilson/Nico Collins/Diontae Johnson/Mi Williams/Marquise Brown/Zay Flowers
TE: Goeddert/Njoku/Ferguson/Harrison Bryant
Team 2 - Good Life
12 tm dynasty PPR, TE premiumQB/2RB/2WR/TE/2FLEX/K/D
http://www64.myfantasyleague.com/2017/home/58823#0
QB: Josh Allen/Dobbs
RB: Jon Taylor/Roschon Johnson/JK Dobbins/Ty Chandler
WR: Diggs/Lockett/Diontae Johnson/Pittman/Elijah Moore/Jayden Reed/Wandale Robinson
TE: Ferguson/Okwonkwo/Juwan Johnson/Tucker Kraft/Ruckert
Team 3 - WFL
12 tm dynasty superflex, PPR, 26 man roster salary cap - no K/DST
QB: Fields/TLawrence/Zach Wilson/Mills
RB: Gibson/Chandler
WR: ACooper/Lockett/Godwin/Rashee Rice/Josh Downs/Mingo/Elijah Moore/WRobinson
TE: Goeddert/Trautman/Brevin Jordan
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2686
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2022 11:20 pm
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
I agree that all else being equal, I'd rather have Flowers than Downs.Diti51 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 6:11 am Guess long term to me. Downs ceiling is Tyler Lockett, but with AR throwing him the ball along with Michael Pittman, not sure Downs ever is more than a low end WR2, high end WR3. Nice piece, but capped upside in that Indy offense.
If debating versus Zay Flowers, I like Flowers more in Baltimore, since competing with just Andrews and not really anyone else
Downs is competing with Pittman and paired with Richardson, who despite physical skills, not as sold on for real football as a passer, not just a weapon. Minshew obviously limited but already far better passer than AR.
Questions start to come in when you start asking about is Flowers + a 2nd worth Downs + a 1st?
Also, not sure about Pittman's future. Very unusual that the 2019 WR class got traded and/or paid in the summer of 2022.
Yet none of the 2020 WR class got paid in the summer of 2023.
I have heard that the Colts have mode no contract offers to Pittman as of now.
I think they probably sign him on a team friendly deal, but if he is looking for top dollar, Colts may just let him go.
2024 WR class is pretty loaded with big WR's, 6'3" and bigger.
Also a chance that ARich improves as a passer too, but obviously right now, Flowers > Downs.
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
I think most people are going to agree Flowers > Downs.
To me the question is Downs or anyone after Addy/JSN/Puka/Flowers. I can't think of a '23 rookie I'd rather have than Downs. But I do think I'd move Downs for a first in SF. I'd rather take a shot at Nabers/Odunze/Keon/etc.
To me the question is Downs or anyone after Addy/JSN/Puka/Flowers. I can't think of a '23 rookie I'd rather have than Downs. But I do think I'd move Downs for a first in SF. I'd rather take a shot at Nabers/Odunze/Keon/etc.
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 14396
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
Currently on pace for 85/1004/4
- Orenthal Shames
- Legend
- Posts: 6666
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:13 pm
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
I think there's an argument to be made for Rice, but overall I'm in agreement.
16 team league
1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 Flex (RB/WR/TE)
26 upman rosters - full point ppr
2015, 17, 18, 19, 20 Champs
QB: Watson, Nix
RB: Bijan, Gibbs, Connor, Benson
WR: Olave, Addison, Flowers, Rice, Sutton, Downs, Mims, Tillman
TE: Kittle, Goedert, Woods
1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 Flex (RB/WR/TE)
26 upman rosters - full point ppr
2015, 17, 18, 19, 20 Champs
QB: Watson, Nix
RB: Bijan, Gibbs, Connor, Benson
WR: Olave, Addison, Flowers, Rice, Sutton, Downs, Mims, Tillman
TE: Kittle, Goedert, Woods
- Dynasty DeLorean
- Degenerate
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
He’s cooking right now.
I understand this is where we were headed, with the new rules and everything, but it’s still incredible how well so many “smaller” wrs are doing lately. Downs, tank, flowers, Addison, Devonta, etc..
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 14396
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
Also, NFL offenses have evolved in general. We're seeing a lot more pre-snap motion, more 3-4 wide sets, better methods of manufacturing touches, and the ways they use players from the slot seem to be more effective as well.Dynasty DeLorean wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 9:41 amHe’s cooking right now.
I understand this is where we were headed, with the new rules and everything, but it’s still incredible how well so many “smaller” wrs are doing lately. Downs, tank, flowers, Addison, Devonta, etc..
I can't think of a rookie class that's had as many undersized players producing immediately as this one.
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
Me neither.Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 9:48 amI can't think of a rookie class that's had as many undersized players producing immediately as this one.
Although I'm sure someone will point out that it happened two years ago.
TEAM 1:
12 Team ppr w/20 keepers - start 1QB 2RB 3WR 1TE 1FLX 6IDP 1DEF
QB: Tua, Lamar, CWilliams
RB: Etienne, Pacheco, JFord, Corum, JWright
WR: Lamb, JChase, Waddle, Pickens, Q Johnston, DeDouglas, MCorley
TE: Goedert, Okongwo
DEF: Cowboys, Ravens
IDP:(LB) Bolton, DLloyd; (DE/DL) Sieler; (S/CB) Pitre, Bates
2023 & 2022 Champion: 2020 third place: 2019 Champion
TEAM 2:
14 Team 30roster SF/ppr/TEP - QB/RB/WR/TE/5FLX/SF
QB: Tua, CJStroud, Carr, AOC, MWhite, Lock
RB: Etienne, Stevenson, GusE, Singletary, AJD, CEH, Spiller
WR: Amon-Ra, Kirk, Dell, Thielen, Gallup, VJefferson, Ch Jones
TE: Andrews, Waller, Taysom, Smythe, WMallory, JOliver
2023 semifinals loser
12 Team ppr w/20 keepers - start 1QB 2RB 3WR 1TE 1FLX 6IDP 1DEF
QB: Tua, Lamar, CWilliams
RB: Etienne, Pacheco, JFord, Corum, JWright
WR: Lamb, JChase, Waddle, Pickens, Q Johnston, DeDouglas, MCorley
TE: Goedert, Okongwo
DEF: Cowboys, Ravens
IDP:(LB) Bolton, DLloyd; (DE/DL) Sieler; (S/CB) Pitre, Bates
2023 & 2022 Champion: 2020 third place: 2019 Champion
TEAM 2:
14 Team 30roster SF/ppr/TEP - QB/RB/WR/TE/5FLX/SF
QB: Tua, CJStroud, Carr, AOC, MWhite, Lock
RB: Etienne, Stevenson, GusE, Singletary, AJD, CEH, Spiller
WR: Amon-Ra, Kirk, Dell, Thielen, Gallup, VJefferson, Ch Jones
TE: Andrews, Waller, Taysom, Smythe, WMallory, JOliver
2023 semifinals loser
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
I'm not sure if you were joking or not but 2021 was kind of a precursor to this. They didn't hit to the extent 2023 has thoughAnteaters wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 12:43 pmMe neither.Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 9:48 amI can't think of a rookie class that's had as many undersized players producing immediately as this one.
Although I'm sure someone will point out that it happened two years ago.
There were a lot of doubts about Waddle and Smith's size. Elijah Moore was a brief hit. Toss in Rondale Moore and Tutu Atwell and there were a lot of early WR that have turned out alright. Of course, I have much higher hopes for several WR in this class than I ever did Rondale/Tutu.
- Dynasty DeLorean
- Degenerate
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: You Should Be Up on Josh Downs
Yeah, Waddle, Olave, etc.. but they were still 180+. Before this season, I conceded, and was like, ok, 180 is the new 195. But now we're seeing this year so many sub-180's do well. 160's and 170's.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 1:27 pmI'm not sure if you were joking or not but 2021 was kind of a precursor to this. They didn't hit to the extent 2023 has thoughAnteaters wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 12:43 pmMe neither.Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 9:48 amI can't think of a rookie class that's had as many undersized players producing immediately as this one.
Although I'm sure someone will point out that it happened two years ago.
There were a lot of doubts about Waddle and Smith's size. Elijah Moore was a brief hit. Toss in Rondale Moore and Tutu Atwell and there were a lot of early WR that have turned out alright. Of course, I have much higher hopes for several WR in this class than I ever did Rondale/Tutu.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: JTLoh, Nordiques, problemsolver and 11 guests