Waddle price check

[Hahaclintondix]

You’re looking at 1.06 + Stevenson/Dobbins at a minimum. Bet you’d get a small portion of Waddle owners who even turn down Smith and 1.06.

If you’re not willing to add to 1.06 it sounds like this is a dead end.

[MFundercover]

I'm willing to add, just not this much. These are really bad suggestions.

[frerichs5]

I'm willing to add, just not this much. These are really bad suggestions.

*in your opinion

No offense, but if you don’t want to hear other peoples’ opinions then don’t ask.

[Jigga94]

I'm willing to add, just not this much. These are really bad suggestions.

*in your opinion

No offense, but if you don’t want to hear other peoples’ opinions then don’t ask.

Yup. If you think Waddle is close or could end up less valuable then 1.06, then don't try and trade for Waddle

[Hahaclintondix]

I'm willing to add, just not this much. These are really bad suggestions.

So is your opinion on the 1.06 vs Waddle. Should probably try 1.06 and a third for Ceedee or AJB. That’ll do it.

[MFundercover]

I'm willing to add, just not this much. These are really bad suggestions.

*in your opinion

No offense, but if you don’t want to hear other peoples’ opinions then don’t ask.

I'm under no obligation to agree. Nothing more annoying than people who dont think their opinion is open to any question or criticism.

These trade suggestions are taco level bad. If you would reject 106 and Smith for Waddle your opinion isnt worth anything. What is being suggested would obviously ruin my team.

[MFundercover]

I'm willing to add, just not this much. These are really bad suggestions.

So is your opinion on the 1.06 vs Waddle. Should probably try 1.06 and a third for Ceedee or AJB. That’ll do it.

Not really. This will be such an easy thread to bump when we see how bad 106 + Smith for Waddle looks. It's not even reasonably close.

I said Waddle is worth more than the 106 but the difference suggested here is kind of a joke

[frerichs5]

I'm willing to add, just not this much. These are really bad suggestions.

*in your opinion

No offense, but if you don’t want to hear other peoples’ opinions then don’t ask.

I'm under no obligation to agree. Nothing more annoying than people who dont think their opinion is open to any question or criticism.

These trade suggestions are taco level bad. If you would reject 106 and Smith for Waddle your opinion isnt worth anything. What is being suggested would obviously ruin my team.

No one said you had to agree. Go back and read the thread. The majority have said they wouldn’t trade Smith + 1.06 for Waddle (agreeing with you). They’re just suggesting Waddle is worth a decent bit more than 1.06. If you don’t agree fine.

You’ve just gone on arguing everyone that 1.06 is closer to Waddle than they think. If that’s your opinion fine. Maybe take your own advice here and realize people aren’t obligated to agree with you.

Good luck

[Mjvb5]

*in your opinion

No offense, but if you don’t want to hear other peoples’ opinions then don’t ask.

I'm under no obligation to agree. Nothing more annoying than people who dont think their opinion is open to any question or criticism.

These trade suggestions are taco level bad. If you would reject 106 and Smith for Waddle your opinion isnt worth anything. What is being suggested would obviously ruin my team.

No one said you had to agree. Go back and read the thread. The majority have said they wouldn’t trade Smith + 1.06 for Waddle (agreeing with you). They’re just suggesting Waddle is worth a decent bit more than 1.06. If you don’t agree fine.

You’ve just gone on arguing everyone that 1.06 is closer to Waddle than they think. If that’s your opinion fine. Maybe take your own advice here and realize people aren’t obligated to agree with you.

Good luck

X2 I wouldn't give my smith and 1.6 for waddle but I'm not giving my waddle for say 1.6 and a 2nd in any world.

[Shortie]

X2 I wouldn't give my smith and 1.6 for waddle but I'm not giving my waddle for say 1.6 and a 2nd in any world.

Reading through this thread, agree that this summarizes the majority of comments. And I feel the same.

Ric flair says: Woooorelax!

[MFundercover]

*in your opinion

No offense, but if you don’t want to hear other peoples’ opinions then don’t ask.

I'm under no obligation to agree. Nothing more annoying than people who dont think their opinion is open to any question or criticism.

These trade suggestions are taco level bad. If you would reject 106 and Smith for Waddle your opinion isnt worth anything. What is being suggested would obviously ruin my team.

No one said you had to agree. Go back and read the thread. The majority have said they wouldn’t trade Smith + 1.06 for Waddle (agreeing with you). They’re just suggesting Waddle is worth a decent bit more than 1.06. If you don’t agree fine.

You’ve just gone on arguing everyone that 1.06 is closer to Waddle than they think. If that’s your opinion fine. Maybe take your own advice here and realize people aren’t obligated to agree with you.

Good luck

What the hell? This is getting straight up weird.

I was referencing a post at the top of this page where somebody said some wouldn't even trade Waddle for Smith and 106. It's a terrible take.

I wouldn't include Rhamondre or Dobbins either. I know calculators and charts arent always a perfect formula, but every one I've seen would greatly favor my side there as well.

If this thread is correct and that's the going rate for Waddle, then hes a screaming sell because hes not worth all that.

[MFundercover]

X2 I wouldn't give my smith and 1.6 for waddle but I'm not giving my waddle for say 1.6 and a 2nd in any world.

Reading through this thread, agree that this summarizes the majority of comments. And I feel the same.

Ric flair says: Woooorelax!

Very weird. That comment is blatantly made up. If you actually re read the comments you would know I never said I'd only add a 2.

[Jrblaha]

I'm under no obligation to agree. Nothing more annoying than people who dont think their opinion is open to any question or criticism.

These trade suggestions are taco level bad. If you would reject 106 and Smith for Waddle your opinion isnt worth anything. What is being suggested would obviously ruin my team.

No one said you had to agree. Go back and read the thread. The majority have said they wouldn’t trade Smith + 1.06 for Waddle (agreeing with you). They’re just suggesting Waddle is worth a decent bit more than 1.06. If you don’t agree fine.

You’ve just gone on arguing everyone that 1.06 is closer to Waddle than they think. If that’s your opinion fine. Maybe take your own advice here and realize people aren’t obligated to agree with you.

Good luck

What the hell? This is getting straight up weird.

I was referencing a post at the top of this page where somebody said some wouldn't even trade Waddle for Smith and 106. It's a terrible take.

I wouldn't include Rhamondre or Dobbins either. I know calculators and charts arent always a perfect formula, but every one I've seen would greatly favor my side there as well.

If this thread is correct and that's the going rate for Waddle, then hes a screaming sell because hes not worth all that.

Trade calc for here actually heavily favors Waddle over 1.6 + dobbins (diff is about a 2025 1st). It does favor 1.6 + Rhamondre more than Waddle but only by a 2024 2nd. Which to me makes sense since I’d be willing to give up 1.6 + dobbins but not 1.6 + Rhamondre.

You might just not like Waddle as much as he’s gotten hyped up. He’s basically on par with Lamb now (which is too high for my liking). Or maybe you like Dobbins more than others do. I’d probably wanna see what QB Waddle will have next year before trading for any Dolphin WR.

[MFundercover]

When was the last time that calculator was updated? No up to date calc or chart would have that.

Anyone trading 1.06 in SF, Dobbins, and an additional 1st for Waddle is an idiot. If that's really his value (you will never get that for him in a real league) then hes a screaming sell.

KTC, Fantasypros, CBS sports all have it going the other way. The 106 and Dobbins will increase in value from here (especially the pick) This thread is a joke or garbage takes. I'll be sure to bump it later.

[abloom]

When was the last time that calculator was updated? No up to date calc or chart would have that

Dlf trade analyzer is updated daily with values from mfl trades and updated monthly using rankings and mock drafts. 1QB is updated first week of the month, 2qb/SF is updated 3rd week of the month.

Waddle is 6th in ADP and in rankings. Smith is in the 40s. I think Smith will rise significantly during playoffs. (1QB values).

There are no recent trades of the two players. Most recent recorded one is from August, Smith + Zeke for waddle and 23 2nd.