Reagor+for 1.06

[vikesguy]

10 man superflex league. Keep the 1.06 or take reagor and the picks?

[Mtt33]

Looks pretty deep if it’s team in sig so I’d take the package, first I’d try to drop the 3rd tho.

[vikesguy]

I updated my sig.

[harr]

Personally, I'd try to package the 1.06 and 1.08 and try to get up into the top 2 or 3 to grab a QB. The 2.03, 2.04, and even the 2.06 in a 10 team SF league should get you some nice pieces, but you need QB help.

[Mtt33]

Personally, I'd try to package the 1.06 and 1.08 and try to get up into the top 2 or 3 to grab a QB. The 2.03, 2.04, and even the 2.06 in a 10 team SF league should get you some nice pieces, but you need QB help.

Just to offer a different perspective, In a 10 team SF where you start 10 rb/wr/te, qb would not be a priority for me and I would likely just acquire cheap options (whether old or deflated value). I’d expect the “big 4” wr/rbs to be gone before 1.06.

[vikesguy]

Qbs drop in our league in rookie drafts because it's 10 man and only 4 points per td. I expect Lawrence to be there at 1.06.

[harr]

I'd still trade up just to make sure. Lawrence going anything but the 1.01 in superflex is...perplexing...regardless of the scoring settings. Great for you, though.

[krtbuckeye]

I'd still trade up just to make sure. Lawrence going anything but the 1.01 in superflex is...perplexing...regardless of the scoring settings. Great for you, though.

I think the more likely culprit of why QBs would be falling in this SF league is that it’s only 10 team and they have to start 10 non-QB position players. Having to start so many other position players drives the QB value down close to what they would be in a something like a 12 team 1QB in my eyes.

I would just hold 1.06 here.

[Gator Sens]

I'd still trade up just to make sure. Lawrence going anything but the 1.01 in superflex is...perplexing...regardless of the scoring settings. Great for you, though.

x2 - fair