Wallace vs. Decker

This is the spot for player-to-player comparisons.
italian_stallion21
Player of the Year
Player of the Year
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:46 am

Wallace vs. Decker

Postby italian_stallion21 » Wed Mar 27, 2013 4:04 pm

I know Decker is the #2 in Denver, but after watching Wallace last year and the fact he just cashed in worries me. Any thoughts on which way to go?

twoangrybadgers
Combine Attendee
Combine Attendee
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:14 am

Re: Wallace vs. Decker

Postby twoangrybadgers » Wed Mar 27, 2013 5:32 pm

Wallace. Decker could be 2B to Welker's 2A. Wallace may have a worse QB situation and offense, but he's the clear No. 1.

Opportunity trumping talent, imo.

User avatar
Krang
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1168
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:12 pm

Re: Wallace vs. Decker

Postby Krang » Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:12 am

twoangrybadgers wrote:Wallace. Decker could be 2B to Welker's 2A. Wallace may have a worse QB situation and offense, but he's the clear No. 1.

Opportunity trumping talent, imo.
I'm not so sure I'd really view Wallace's "opportunity" to be better than Decker's. Even if Decker winds up being the WR3 in the Denver offense, I could still see him surpassing Wallace's numbers, and it wouldn't surprise me one bit.

User avatar
Team Tacos
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2743
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:30 am

Re: Wallace vs. Decker

Postby Team Tacos » Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:21 pm

I don't picture Welkers numbers being better than Stokley's were last year. I know he's more talented, but Peytons connection to Stokley from the Colts should have meant that he'd throw him the ball as much as possible. I don't think Decker's numbers suffer as much as people think they will even with Welker on the Broncos.
WR: OBJ, Dez, AJG, K. Allen, Crowder, K. White;
RB: Gurley, Montgomery, Lacy; QB: Wilson, Goff; TE: Eifert;
DL: Bosa, Danielle H., Ansah, Frank Clark;
LB: Telvin, Kwon, Collins, Jatavis, D. Lee; DEF: KC;
DB: Burnett, C-Dix, S. Davis; K:

Rookie Bench: C. Coleman, Doctson, N. Spence, Jaylon, Jack;
IR:

Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 RB/WR/TE, 2 WR, 1 WR/TE, 1 TE, 1 K, 1 DEF, 4 LB, 3 DL, 4 DB
12 teams, Non-PPR, tackle heavy w/ TFL.

User avatar
KMA
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3548
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:36 pm

Re: Wallace vs. Decker

Postby KMA » Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:32 pm

I have no horse in this race and I think I would prefer the clear cut number one receiver in his offense. Mike Wallace. I think Decker struggles to crack 1000 yards this season.
Sentenced to Redraft Duty

Wentz / Goff
Jacobs / Mack / Coleman / Mixon
OBJ / Adams / Thielen / Sutton / Gallup / Davis
Ertz / Henry

User avatar
Team Tacos
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2743
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:30 am

Re: Wallace vs. Decker

Postby Team Tacos » Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:30 pm

georg013 wrote:I have no horse in this race and I think I would prefer the clear cut number one receiver in his offense. Mike Wallace. I think Decker struggles to crack 1000 yards this season.
I'm worried about Decker repeating last year's performance for sure, but I'm hoping for the best I guess. I also don't trust Dolphins receivers that much. However, if there is one to own, I think it's Wallace.

mzkp54
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3375
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:26 pm

Re: Wallace vs. Decker

Postby mzkp54 » Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:12 pm

I was recently offered Decker for my Wallace and turned it down. I think Wallace has a higher upside.
12 tm/PPR/SF/TE+/Full IDP (start 11/11)/Contracts
QB- Kyler, TLaw Stafford
RB- Dowdle, Mitchell
WR- JJ, Lamb, ARSB, DJM, Kirk QJ
TE- Engram, Schultz
PK/CB-
DT- Wilkins, Vea
DE- Bosa, Young, Landry Ebukam
LB- Campbell,Speed, Mcfadden, Dodson
S-
1.02, 1.11
3 '25 1sts, 4 '26 1sts

User avatar
??Droppedballs??
Player of the Year
Player of the Year
Posts: 2205
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:13 pm

Re: Wallace vs. Decker

Postby ??Droppedballs?? » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:30 pm

To chime in as a Broncos fan. I think Decker takes a very same hit on his numbers. I also think Welker can get his 100 rec. The people who will be hurt most by the Welker signing is the Broncos TEs. Think the Number of rec between the TEs and Stockley last yr was somewhere near 140 rec. I can see Welker taking close to 100 of those. A lot less 2 TE sets nd a lot more 3 WR sets coming.

That being said ill take Decker over Wallace and his 1 route ability

User avatar
JohnnyFive
Captain
Captain
Posts: 764
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 7:08 pm
Location: Janesville, Wisconsin

Re: Wallace vs. Decker

Postby JohnnyFive » Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:26 pm

??Droppedballs?? wrote:To chime in as a Broncos fan. I think Decker takes a very same hit on his numbers. I also think Welker can get his 100 rec. The people who will be hurt most by the Welker signing is the Broncos TEs. Think the Number of rec between the TEs and Stockley last yr was somewhere near 140 rec. I can see Welker taking close to 100 of those. A lot less 2 TE sets nd a lot more 3 WR sets coming.

That being said ill take Decker over Wallace and his 1 route ability
I agree with this. I don't think Decker or DThom take a big hit in production. Manning has had 3 1000 yard receivers before. I think it was in 04 when Harrison, Wayne, and Stokely did it. James had over 1500 total yards that year too.
Keep On Rockin In The Free World

User avatar
Chandler Bing
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4314
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:36 pm

Re: Wallace vs. Decker

Postby Chandler Bing » Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:55 pm

Wallace for me


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests