Tannehill or Bradford?

Postby **TryingToWin** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:39 pm

Who ya got?

Postby **Team Tacos** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:22 pm

tannehill by just a little bit

Postby **BPP** » Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:25 pm

Tannehill due to his legs. When you are drafting a backup QB, I'd suggest going for the one with the highest upside.

Postby **DRS540** » Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:50 am

I'd take Tannehill. I like what I've seen so far and I believe there's room to grow.

Postby **meineymoe** » Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:35 am

I'm leaning Tannehill, but I'll take whichever one is available to cover my starter's bye week.

-oo-

Postby **melish1631** » Thu Feb 14, 2013 12:27 pm

Tannehill, especially after they add a WR in free agency as expected

Postby **Big Al** » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:56 pm

I own both on different teams but prefer Tannehill more. He did alright with little help in his first year and has more upside going forward.

Postby **will6779** » Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:33 pm

I was impressed with how thill played this year. Nobody should be anle to sniff a starting qb job in the nfl with as little qb experiants as he has. Gotta bode well for the future.

Postby **ekassor** » Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:45 am

I'll take Bradford, but I like them both. Bradford has classic pocket passer skills, but lacks a supporting cast. Over the near term that will hold him back, but I think in the long run he'll be the better choice.

Dynasty League Football Forum