1.03+ Vs TLAW+

[noen10]

team 1 in sig, Considering offering this:

Give:
Tlaw
Tnak Dell

Get:
1.03
Bryce young

He now wants:

Give:
TLAW
Drake london OR Waddle

Get:
1.03
Bryce young

I want to counter with adding 2025 2nd mid. I think the 24 2.03 is too much.

Thoughts?

[Black Adam]

Lawrence side, but it’s a push.

I wouldn’t be trying to acquire Young and I wouldn’t ship the 1.03 for that in 1QB either.

[TheTroll]

Lawrence side, but it’s a push.

I wouldn’t be trying to acquire Young and I wouldn’t ship the 1.03 for that in 1QB either.

TLaw side for me but it’s not out of the realm to take a chance either.

[NathanielWegman]

Give me the TLaw side easily. The downgrade from Trevor to Young is fairly significant

[noen10]

Okay, Team 1 below. This is a Superflex league.

He now wants:

Give:
TLAW
Drake london OR Waddle

Get:
1.03
Bryce young

I want to counter with adding 2025 2nd mid. I think the 24 2.03 is too much.

Thoughts?

[Dynasty DeLorean]

Who do you want at 1.03. I’m trying to make sense of why you want to do this. We don’t know how Youngs career will turns out, but as of this moment, he’s trending towards being a bust.

[noen10]

I would want nabers.

[Dynasty DeLorean]

I would want nabers.

Nabers is great, and I’d value him over London and waddle, but not sure the gap is TLaw to young. If you can get 2.03 added then that makes more sense to me. 2.03 is really good this year, probably the best 2.03 since Pittman’s class

[noen10]

I would want nabers.

Nabers is great, and I’d value him over London and waddle, but not sure the gap is TLaw to young. If you can get 2.03 added then that makes more sense to me. 2.03 is really good this year, probably the best 2.03 since Pittman’s class

I am trying to make a move up to 1.5, or 1.6 too.

Would you rather move london or Waddle? My lean is london, but he is also the #1 on his team where as waddle is #2.

[Dynasty DeLorean]

I would want nabers.

Nabers is great, and I’d value him over London and waddle, but not sure the gap is TLaw to young. If you can get 2.03 added then that makes more sense to me. 2.03 is really good this year, probably the best 2.03 since Pittman’s class

I am trying to make a move up to 1.5, or 1.6 too.

Would you rather move london or Waddle? My lean is london, but he is also the #1 on his team where as waddle is #2.

I don’t have a strong opinion either way.

If you have to have Nabers, go get your guy. I’d try getting the 2nd added first though

[Menace2010]

Yeah the WR upgrade isn't worth the QB downgrade as currently constructed. Get more or walk away.

[NathanielWegman]

I’d need at least the 2.03 to consider this. The upgrade at WR isn’t enough to cover the downgrade at QB

[FantasyFreak]

T Law side by a lot. Bryce Young is a falling knife.

[jobiegermano]

I’ve never been in a SF league, so take with a grain of salt, but you have Allen and Kyler too. This might be a make or break year for TLaw and I have zero faith in the Jagoffs. I would keep Waddle over London. How certain that you’ll get Nabers? I assume you think MHJ will be one of the first two picks, but Nabers could go second. So you would either get him or Caleb, right? In a single QB league I'd expect MHJ, Nabers, then Odunze to go 3rd, but for SF I assume Caleb will be in the first 3 picks, maybe first overall?

I’d do it with the r2 pick added, but I just don’t like TLaw, might be biased.

[Black Adam]

He now wants:

Give:
TLAW
Drake london OR Waddle

Get:
1.03
Bryce young

I want to counter with adding 2025 2nd mid. I think the 24 2.03 is too much.

Thoughts?

Waddle is less valuable than London is, but London or Waddle + Lawrence for 1.03 and Young is like a 33% overpay in value. I'm not a fan of Lawrence so dealing him in SF would be fine by me.

I'd be fine with doing that deal to get your guy, just know you're overpaying and that you can't really be sure Nabers will even be there at 3, can you?

Personally, I'd get Bryce Young taken out of the deal and something else added in his place since I think he's trash.