1.2 or Barkley

[Djg1996]

Team 1

Give 1.2
Get Barkley

I know I should probably just take Nabers and move on, but in a 20 team league, backs like Barkley can put you over the top. I’m fairly confident in Higgins will rediscover his rapport with Burrow. Thinking Flowers and Reed take a step forward and I want to win now. Was second in points last year, missed playoffs. The 1.2 is the only pick I have, plus if I acquire Barkley I’ll still have $35-40 in cap space to sign FAs

What would you guys do?

[kellysheroes]

Take Nabers

[BabyChark23]

Nabers

[gogobradyarm]

I imagine Barkely is worth more than 1.02 in this format, but you would have Barkley and Jerome Ford at RB. I don't think this roster would be able to compete, unless you were able to fill in the other RB gap via FA. How would FA work with RBs?

Caveat this, I've never done a contract league or a 20 team league, so take my input with a grain of salt.

[Black Adam]

Barkley isn’t worth the 1.02 straight-up in a 16 teamer, I can’t believe his value goes up that much in a 20 man league.


Taking Nabers with the 1.02 and not thinking twice about it, and I say that as a huge Barkley fan.

[Menace2010]

In this format, all in, I can see the move. But on long-term value hate it. Would grab Nabers and try to buy an aging vet with Reed or Downs.

[TheTroll]

In this format, all in, I can see the move. But on long-term value hate it. Would grab Nabers and try to buy an aging vet with Reed or Downs.

This! Nabers is the play and you can always deal for a RB if needed later.

[Djg1996]

Thanks everyone for the input. I rejected the offer, gonna take Nabers

[TheTroll]

Thanks everyone for the input. I rejected the offer, gonna take Nabers

You are getting an amazing talent the likes of which, you will tell your grand kids someday.

[Djg1996]

Thanks everyone for the input. I rejected the offer, gonna take Nabers

You are getting an amazing talent the likes of which, you will tell your grand kids someday.

let’s hope so! He sure seems like a can’t miss.