Where to take rookie 1.1 in startup

[lawilt]

For 12 and 16 team leagues, when would you be willing to pull the trigger and take the rookie 1.1 over a vet in start up?

[mzkp54]

I've been seeing 1.01 go somewhere between picks 10-15 in startups this offseason

[Dynastymc]

I think you see rookie 1.01 off the board around the 12th overall pick. Good Luck

[MacDaddy123]

I've been seeing 1.01 go somewhere between picks 10-15 in startups this offseason

^^^This sounds about right.

[tstafford]

I've been seeing 1.01 go somewhere between picks 10-15 in startups this offseason

^^^This sounds about right.

Never ceases to amaze me, but I bet this is exactly right.

FWIW - I think we should get some ADP data soon from Ryan M that includes the rookies. Always fun to unpack that.

[Mtt33]

I've been seeing 1.01 go somewhere between picks 10-15 in startups this offseason

^^^This sounds about right.

Never ceases to amaze me, but I bet this is exactly right.

FWIW - I think we should get some ADP data soon from Ryan M that includes the rookies. Always fun to unpack that.

It’s made from smal sample size of random people mock drafting so it’s not great adp data but it’s fun to unpack nonetheless!

[CGW]

In SF, it'll be around pick 12-14, depending if the owners there prefer the RBs or CW/MHJ.
Mahomes
Allen
Stroud
JJ
Chase
Lamb
Jackson
Hurts
Burrow
Herbert
ARSB
Bijan
Hall

[MacDaddy123]

In SF, it'll be around pick 12-14, depending if the owners there prefer the RBs or CW/MHJ.
Mahomes
Allen
Stroud
JJ
Chase
Lamb
Jackson
Hurts
Burrow
Herbert
ARSB
Bijan
Hall

I have seen over a dozen startup drafts done on various podcasts, and have yet to see any RB go ahead of the 1.01 in any of them.

Now I could see that happening in leagues where scoring favors RB's, 0.5 PPR or 0 PPR leagues, PPC leagues, or something like that.
However, with no PPC, no PFFD, Full PPR, RB's just are not going that high, from what I have seen.

Also, no way I would put a RB up that high on my board either.

[Mtt33]

In SF, it'll be around pick 12-14, depending if the owners there prefer the RBs or CW/MHJ.
Mahomes
Allen
Stroud
JJ
Chase
Lamb
Jackson
Hurts
Burrow
Herbert
ARSB
Bijan
Hall

I have seen over a dozen startup drafts done on various podcasts, and have yet to see any RB go ahead of the 1.01 in any of them.

Now I could see that happening in leagues where scoring favors RB's, 0.5 PPR or 0 PPR leagues, PPC leagues, or something like that.
However, with no PPC, no PFFD, Full PPR, RB's just are not going that high, from what I have seen.

Also, no way I would put a RB up that high on my board either.

To be fair the podcasters/Twitter self proclaimed experts always lean more toward wr and qb than the real drafts. That said I absolutely agree 1.01 will be ahead of the rbs in all ADP this off-season. There will be drafts that’s nkt the case but if we are talking average position 1.01 will be up in that late first range I think.

[MacDaddy123]

In SF, it'll be around pick 12-14, depending if the owners there prefer the RBs or CW/MHJ.
Mahomes
Allen
Stroud
JJ
Chase
Lamb
Jackson
Hurts
Burrow
Herbert
ARSB
Bijan
Hall

I have seen over a dozen startup drafts done on various podcasts, and have yet to see any RB go ahead of the 1.01 in any of them.

Now I could see that happening in leagues where scoring favors RB's, 0.5 PPR or 0 PPR leagues, PPC leagues, or something like that.
However, with no PPC, no PFFD, Full PPR, RB's just are not going that high, from what I have seen.

Also, no way I would put a RB up that high on my board either.

To be fair the podcasters/Twitter self proclaimed experts always lean more toward wr and qb than the real drafts. That said I absolutely agree 1.01 will be ahead of the rbs in all ADP this off-season. There will be drafts that’s nkt the case but if we are talking average position 1.01 will be up in that late first range I think.

Agreed. There will always be outliers of any generalization.

I just watched 2 startups tonight, 1.01 went at 1.12 and 2.01 in 12 team SF startup draft.
Top RB went at 2.10 and 2.09 respectfully.

Fantasy Stock Exchange and DynastyLand were the 2 different sites of these startups.

I think QB/WR go first due to longevity.
As QB/WR careers last longer than RB careers on average.

[tstafford]

I just watched 2 startups tonight, 1.01 went at 1.12 and 2.01 in 12 team SF startup draft.
Top RB went at 2.10 and 2.09 respectfully.

Fantasy Stock Exchange and DynastyLand were the 2 different sites of these startups.

Do you recall when the 1.02 went in those drafts?

[CGW]

I just watched 2 startups tonight, 1.01 went at 1.12 and 2.01 in 12 team SF startup draft.
Top RB went at 2.10 and 2.09 respectfully.

Fantasy Stock Exchange and DynastyLand were the 2 different sites of these startups.

Do you recall when the 1.02 went in those drafts?

I'm just guessing here, but probably within the next pick or two. 1.01 and 1.02 are valued almost the same in this class, as evidenced by how many people are willing to take MHJ over CW and vice versa.

[grooner]

In my startup that started about a week ago (12tm superflex, TE premium) the 1.01 went pick 14.

[MacDaddy123]

I just watched 2 startups tonight, 1.01 went at 1.12 and 2.01 in 12 team SF startup draft.
Top RB went at 2.10 and 2.09 respectfully.

Fantasy Stock Exchange and DynastyLand were the 2 different sites of these startups.

Do you recall when the 1.02 went in those drafts?

1.02 (MHJ) went at 2.03 in both drafts.

Just watched another mock SF startup done by Ron Stewart.
1.01 went at 1.09, and 1.02 was again 2.03.

Top RB did go at 2.04, which was earlier than normal.

[MacDaddy123]

I just watched 2 startups tonight, 1.01 went at 1.12 and 2.01 in 12 team SF startup draft.
Top RB went at 2.10 and 2.09 respectfully.

Fantasy Stock Exchange and DynastyLand were the 2 different sites of these startups.

Do you recall when the 1.02 went in those drafts?

I'm just guessing here, but probably within the next pick or two. 1.01 and 1.02 are valued almost the same in this class, as evidenced by how many people are willing to take MHJ over CW and vice versa.

You are correct. 1.02 went at 2.03 in both drafts.
2 picks later in one draft and 3 picks later in the other.