Waddle + for GWilson +

[Major_Loser]

It has been a wild day for trade offers, this just came into my email.

I give: Waddle, DJM and Njoku

I get: GWilson and Dotson

Thoughts? I don't know if it really improves me.

[Gator Sens]

Value is with Waddle + for me but it's very close. Waddle and Wilson are close but Moore + Njoku only slightly over Dotson. Total toss up and preference deal. I don't like Moore as a consistent asset but his value has rebounded a bit and Waddle is more proven than Wilson. Good deal both ways.

[repkllrs]

Value is with Waddle + for me but it's very close. Waddle and Wilson are close but Moore + Njoku only slightly over Dotson. Total toss up and preference deal. I don't like Moore as a consistent asset but his value has rebounded a bit and Waddle is more proven than Wilson. Good deal both ways.

I agree with all of this, but I like Wilson more than Waddle and would probably make this trade.

[TheTroll]

With all the 1,000s of trade posts here, this one is a true toss up so kudos to both trade partners. This is absolutely a preference deal and can’t fault either side. Just go get your guy(s).

[tstafford]

With all the 1,000s of trade posts here, this one is a true toss up so kudos to both trade partners. This is absolutely a preference deal and can’t fault either side. Just go get your guy(s).

I'm with this. All four are WRs that I would want to roster. None of them are guys I am avoiding even at cost.

And my preference would be the Wilson side. Wilson has top-5 upside and I love Dotson.

[dblj1199]

I can really go either way on this deal. Wilson have top 5 potential as well as Waddle. Too me it comes down to your te's, if you believe Pitts will rebound and they can sustain a passing attack and you won't need Njoku then go for it.

[moishetreats]

I guess I'm on the only who sees this is as a clear win for one side:

G Wilson > (maybe even >>) than Waddle
Dotson > DJM
Njoke doesn't make up the Dotson > DJM side, let alone both.

I'd take G Wilson alone over the package.

[hoos89]

I guess I'm on the only who sees this is as a clear win for one side:

G Wilson > (maybe even >>) than Waddle
Dotson > DJM
Njoke doesn't make up the Dotson > DJM side, let alone both.

I'd take G Wilson alone over the package.

Reasonable minds can disagree as to whether Wilson or Waddle is more valuable. Waddle had 75/1356/8 last year. Same with Dotson and Moore.

[MacDaddy123]

Fair trade, but I'd prefer the GW/Dotson side.

[moishetreats]

I guess I'm on the only who sees this is as a clear win for one side:

G Wilson > (maybe even >>) than Waddle
Dotson > DJM
Njoke doesn't make up the Dotson > DJM side, let alone both.

I'd take G Wilson alone over the package.

Reasonable minds can disagree as to whether Wilson or Waddle is more valuable. Waddle had 75/1356/8 last year. Same with Dotson and Moore.

I can't think of the last time someone has credited me with a "reasonable mind"!

[stpilots98]

I prefer the GW Dotson side. Fair trade as everyone else has stated.

[FantasyFreak]

GW/Dotson side for me.

[-THE DUDE-]

I think I favor the GW/Dotson side as well but it is close. I have and love both GW and Waddle but think GW has a clearer path to an alpha role vs Waddle being the teams 2. Close trade though for sure