Tee or Gibbs?

[SStory93]

12 Team SF PPR thoughts?

[moishetreats]

I think Higgins and Pitts are the two best pieces. But there's a real argument to be made for any order of any of the four since they all play different positions and are all young.

[Gator Sens]

SF makes you want to lean Stroud + and the value is solid on that side with hope and hype. Pitts takes a hit for me in most formats but certainly non-premieum.

[tstafford]

Gibbs and Higgins are close on value - whether that should be the case or not is debatable I guess. But it is what it is.

I'd much rather own Stroud than Pitts in non-TEP SF.

[pjb5150]

Wow. I read this as just tee for gibbs straight up at first before seeing poll and instant answer was gibbs. Especially after looking at your wr depth. But pitts+tee for gibbs and unproven stroud too much for me.

Id try to pivot and go tee + a 2nd (regardless of early versus late) for just gibbs. Keep pitts.

[Jigga94]

I am not big on either rookie so I would likely hold.

[murphysxm]

Stroud in a SF is being undervalued to me in comments. Esp looking at your QB room, this is inexpensive to buy a young high draft capital QB

[Anteaters]

Stroud in a SF is being undervalued to me in comments. Esp looking at your QB room, this is inexpensive to buy a young high draft capital QB

++

[MajinMode]

If you don’t have a stable qb core I feel like you have to take the gibbs side. Qb is top priority for me in SF. If you are good at qb it’s a pretty good cashout to get pitts and tee.

[Menace2010]

We've seen both Higgins and Pitts produce 1,000 yard seasons in the NFL. I can't ship two proven assets for two lotto tickets...

[FF_Finesser]

Higgins and Pitts for me.

[stpilots98]

Give me the side with the young QB in SF. It's close though