Trading 1.02

[SVF96]

I was offered the following trade:

Give: lamar, Andrews, 1.02
Get: burrow, Olave, Higgins

Would it be worth giving up the positional advantage at TE and 1.02 to get extremely good WR depth and a possible QB upgrade? Team and league setting in signature.

[BigBawseRoss]

ya im prob taking burrow olave higgins here since you have goedert and engram.

[Mtt33]

Pretty deep starting positions so that negates some of the 2TE but not enough for me. The 2te gives andrews too much value, I’d hold.

[Gator Sens]

Based on the format, I think you are giving too much here. There are very few good TEs in fantasy and you would be moving one of the best in a start 2 format.

[tstafford]

I'd pass as well.

But I see some arguments for it:
Andrews is older than some might think. Plus he's only had one season where he was truly difference making and provided significant positional advantage.
As a Lamar owner I can see the allure of Burrow. Lamar is less consistent, plays a more injury prone style and is reportedly hoping to dial down the running. (Maybe that 3rd part is good)
1.02 isn't Bijan. (But it is either Gibbs or your QB of choice.)

I think what this would come down to for me is Higgins. I own him and don't love it. We all believed Chase was the alpha and a superior talent and it showed up for the first time in the stats last year. Higgins is capped now - he will never be a top-10 WR for FF baring an extended absence for Chase. He's a solid WR2 and will probably end the season as something like WR15. There's nothing wrong with that but it isn't an elite asset.

[tsarpepe]

Piling on: hold your side.

[FantasyFoosball]

It's close, but seeing as how it's a ten team league, I'd hold your side.

[TheTroll]

hold your side!

[Iamwebb223]

I was offered the following trade:

Give: lamar, Andrews, 1.02
Get: burrow, Olave, Higgins

Would it be worth giving up the positional advantage at TE and 1.02 to get extremely good WR depth and a possible QB upgrade? Team and league setting in signature.

With the starting requirements I'd say you have to hold here. Not only is it start 2 TE but it's also start 3 RB. 3 starting RBs are a lot harder to come by than 4 starting WR's. Looks like you also have 2 early 2nd's. I'd go 2 WR's at those picks and hope at least 1 hits.