Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
- Dynasty DeLorean
- Degenerate
- Posts: 8926
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am
Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Last edited by Dynasty DeLorean on Sat Mar 04, 2023 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
In 1QB as well.
Team
1Q|2R|3W|1T|2FLX - 12 Team PPR
QB: Love, AR, Cousins, Flacco
RB: CMC, Bijan, Ford, Mitchell, Pierce, Kendre, Tucker
WR: Deebo, Wilson, Olave, Puka, Flowers, Addison, Jeudy, Jamo, Burks
TE: McBride, Kincaid, Fant, Bellinger
1Q|2R|3W|1T|2FLX - 12 Team PPR
QB: Love, AR, Cousins, Flacco
RB: CMC, Bijan, Ford, Mitchell, Pierce, Kendre, Tucker
WR: Deebo, Wilson, Olave, Puka, Flowers, Addison, Jeudy, Jamo, Burks
TE: McBride, Kincaid, Fant, Bellinger
- Dynasty DeLorean
- Degenerate
- Posts: 8926
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Dynasty startup 1.01.
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
My rankings:
ARich
Kincaid
Mayer
ARich
Kincaid
Mayer
-
- Role Player
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:52 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Jokes aside, his upside is legit “highest scoring QB ever”. He could be a bust too and I have no problems if that’s how it plays out. He’s worth the risk, both in fantasy and real life. Especially fantasy though.
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2580
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 1:09 pm
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
He's going to make a really good WR.
-
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3907
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:12 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
It’s odd that people in several threads are astounded by his measurables and are moving him up because of them. Everyone knew he was a great athlete. That’s not where the shortcomings are in his QB game. All the passing issues still remain.
Last edited by Bronco Billy on Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 769
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2018 1:26 pm
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
How condescendingly dismissiveBronco Billy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:44 pm It’s odd that people in several threads are astounded by his measurables and are moving him up because of them. Everyone knew he was a great athlete. That’s not where the shortcomings are in his QB game. All the passing issues still remain. Maybe a team can invert the veer option and he can pick up passing yards by lateraling forward.
-
- Degenerate
- Posts: 7557
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 11:53 pm
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
I don't know about astounded, but agree overall. An athlete showing off how athletic he is isn't stunning.Bronco Billy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:44 pm It’s odd that people in several threads are astounded by his measurables and are moving him up because of them. Everyone knew he was a great athlete. That’s not where the shortcomings are in his QB game. All the passing issues still remain.
Daniel Jeremiah spoke with two teams not in the market for a QB and both put him as their #2 QB.
League #1- 14 tm ppr, 1Q, 2R, 3W, 1T, 1 R/W/T, 1K
1 DT, 2 DE, 2 LB, 1 CB, 1 S, 1 flex
League #2- 12 team PPR, 1Q, 1R, 2W, 1T, 1 R/W/T, 1 W/R/T, 1 Def
League #3- 12 tm PPR, 1Q, 0R (yes, ZERO RB) 3W, 1T, 2 R/W/T flex, 1 Def
1 DT, 2 DE, 2 LB, 1 CB, 1 S, 1 flex
League #2- 12 team PPR, 1Q, 1R, 2W, 1T, 1 R/W/T, 1 W/R/T, 1 Def
League #3- 12 tm PPR, 1Q, 0R (yes, ZERO RB) 3W, 1T, 2 R/W/T flex, 1 Def
- Dynasty DeLorean
- Degenerate
- Posts: 8926
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Always been a pet peeve of mine on that aspect
1) While I agree that double counting isn’t ideal, I do believe there is added value in a confirmation of something.
2) specifically regarding Anthony Goaterson, he didn’t just test pretty good athletically, he tested as arguably the most athletic qb of all time. There’s a difference.
1) While I agree that double counting isn’t ideal, I do believe there is added value in a confirmation of something.
2) specifically regarding Anthony Goaterson, he didn’t just test pretty good athletically, he tested as arguably the most athletic qb of all time. There’s a difference.
-
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3907
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:12 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
@ the bolded.Dynasty DeLorean wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:47 pm 2) specifically regarding Anthony Goaterson, he didn’t just test pretty good athletically, he tested as arguably the most athletic qb of all time. There’s a difference.
Being a great athlete is not equivalent to being a great QB. There can be a significant disconnect between the two, and I believe Richardson may be a case in point. We’ll see…
-
- Role Player
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:52 am
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Exactly. We knew he was an incredible athlete but didn’t know he was full on cyborg. And really it doesn’t change *too much* for me as I already liked him plenty. I hadn’t really considered Where exactly I would draft him before today, but now he feels worth a late 1st in single QB leagues. Not sure about SF but you gotta at least consider him at 1.01. Don’t think that was the case prior.
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
I fundamentally hate agreeing with BB. On this I completely do. AR is not fit to play the position of QB in the NFL.Bronco Billy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:44 pm It’s odd that people in several threads are astounded by his measurables and are moving him up because of them. Everyone knew he was a great athlete. That’s not where the shortcomings are in his QB game. All the passing issues still remain.
I am just a guy sharing some thoughts
Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Agree, big thing for me is I dont even bother looking into QB film or anyone else's review on them. The reality is this is a total crap shoot so I just go off who the NFL says is good as far as that goes and This performance should solidify him into a top 5 draft spot with that rushing ability. Could he be trey lance sure but the upside at any non 1.1 is worth it to meskinfanjon wrote: ↑Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:54 pm Exactly. We knew he was an incredible athlete but didn’t know he was full on cyborg. And really it doesn’t change *too much* for me as I already liked him plenty. I hadn’t really considered Where exactly I would draft him before today, but now he feels worth a late 1st in single QB leagues. Not sure about SF but you gotta at least consider him at 1.01. Don’t think that was the case prior.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], mild and 32 guests