Drake london startup value

[jponte3]

How early would people be willing to take drake london in a 12 team superflex startup if your building your team on the younger side? How do you value him compared to guys like metcalf, Dj moore, diontae Johnson etc.
Appreciate any feedback!

[BigBawseRoss]

value him less than those guys

[BigBawseRoss]

jeudy, d smith, eli moore tier id say

[Gator Sens]

jeudy, d smith, eli moore tier id say

x2 - this seems like a fair range to grab London.

[Ice]

I personally think London has a high bust factor but I might gamble on him over DJM due to red zone opportunity but even that is iffy.

London just isn't the type of player I like. Great size but that sloth like speed leads to massive separation issues. He is not without route skill like most larger slow WR's so he may be okay but too much risk for me.

Diontae and DK are several rounds better IMO.

[jponte3]

I personally think London has a high bust factor but I might gamble on him over DJM due to red zone opportunity but even that is iffy.

London just isn't the type of player I like. Great size but that sloth like speed leads to massive separation issues. He is not without route skill like most larger slow WR's so he may be okay but too much risk for me.

Diontae and DK are several rounds better IMO.

I do respectfully disagree with you on the separation issues. I feel thats the common misconception due to some recent guys like nkeal harry etc, but if you look at his tape consistently in college he definitely separates quite well and I feel that certain things that analyze this in detail such as matt harmons reception perception have kind of proven this to be inaccurate

[Mjvb5]

In the pittman, diontae, godwin, terry, hill range for me so like 5th round probably

[Ice]

I personally think London has a high bust factor but I might gamble on him over DJM due to red zone opportunity but even that is iffy.

London just isn't the type of player I like. Great size but that sloth like speed leads to massive separation issues. He is not without route skill like most larger slow WR's so he may be okay but too much risk for me.

Diontae and DK are several rounds better IMO.

I do respectfully disagree with you on the separation issues. I feel thats the common misconception due to some recent guys like nkeal harry etc, but if you look at his tape consistently in college he definitely separates quite well and I feel that certain things that analyze this in detail such as matt harmons reception perception have kind of proven this to be inaccurate

No worries many do disagree.

My take is NFL quality DB's are vastly better than those in the Pac 10. Harry is was open a ton in college as well. Granted I believe and stated London does have some route skill to hopefully offset his sloth like speed. Pitt's on the same team is bigger, stronger, and way faster which also may help in taking some pressure off but one can analyze every college play but in the end NFL quality DB's can defeat the vast majority of 4.7 plus speed IMO which is what I think he really runs. I know he said his fastest time was 4.5 but that was probably hand timed.

His upside to me is may be a M. Colston although Colston was way faster so if you like him I concede he could be that. He doesn't profile against many really good players. I think his comp by NFL combine scouts was McCaffrey so he does have his fans.

[jponte3]

I personally think London has a high bust factor but I might gamble on him over DJM due to red zone opportunity but even that is iffy.

London just isn't the type of player I like. Great size but that sloth like speed leads to massive separation issues. He is not without route skill like most larger slow WR's so he may be okay but too much risk for me.

Diontae and DK are several rounds better IMO.

I do respectfully disagree with you on the separation issues. I feel thats the common misconception due to some recent guys like nkeal harry etc, but if you look at his tape consistently in college he definitely separates quite well and I feel that certain things that analyze this in detail such as matt harmons reception perception have kind of proven this to be inaccurate

No worries many do disagree.

My take is NFL quality DB's are vastly better than those in the Pac 10. Harry is was open a ton in college as well. Granted I believe and stated London does have some route skill to hopefully offset his sloth like speed. Pitt's on the same team is bigger, stronger, and way faster which also may help in taking some pressure off but one can analyze every college play but in the end NFL quality DB's can defeat the vast majority of 4.7 plus speed IMO which is what I think he really runs. I know he said his fastest time was 4.5 but that was probably hand timed.

His upside to me is may be a M. Colston although Colston was way faster so if you like him I concede he could be that. He doesn't profile against many really good players. I think his comp by NFL combine scouts was McCaffrey so he does have his fans.

If you truly feel that his 40 time is 4.7+ then i certainly understand where your coming from. I personally just do not feel that that is the case. 4.7+ is truly like the bottom 3-5% of wrs. While i dont think hes fast by anymeans, I do feel he is certainly faster than that.

[XclickX]

I’d take him slightly before DJM, DK, Diontae but they are all in a tier so just take your fave.

[lukkynumber13]

jeudy, d smith, eli moore tier id say

This is a good ballpark for him.

I have my WR1 in this class as player #48 in a SF, 2TE startup I'm about to embark on