Pittman vs Conner

[fantasydem]

For team 1 in signature, would you guys move Conner for Pittman? Pittman would obviously be my WR5 but gives me added depth at the position but also leaving my RB room thinner. Thoughts?

[pvega002]

If one of your RBs goes down you're going to wish you had Conner. Barkley hasn't been the healthiest. You're stacked at WR dont see Pittman starting over your guys unless Godwin isn't ready to go.

[Ruggenater]

Value-wise, this is easily Pittman. I’d make the deal now and worry about filling the RB hole later in the offseason.

[murphysxm]

Value-wise, this is easily Pittman. I’d make the deal now and worry about filling the RB hole later in the offseason.

agreed

[Gator Sens]

I think you make the deal on value alone. It's not great for your build but Conner is unlikely to replicate last year and Arizona may still add a back.

[halfbaked88]

I have zero confidence Conner makes it through the season. And when that happens, you have an injury prone 27 year old RB on your roster.

vs a young WR who just got a QB upgrade.

Pittman easily.

[HerbUrban]

Take Pittman and worry about your RB later. Worst case scenario, you have a surplus of WR to deal for a young/better RB than Conner.

[cvbuc]

Easily take Pittman. Value is on his side right now and in two years this is an absolute landslide value wise.