Trading 21 picks

[JoshuaGordon_9]

Team 1 in signature.
Contender - playoffs are pretty much set. 6th place (final) playoff spot up for grabs, but looks like I'll be 4th. I'm also 4th in points, and ~80 Fantasy points behind 1st, so definitely right in the mix.

Tanking team is interested in my picks. Hes got a few interesting pieces:

Mahomes (Untouchable), Tua, Glennon
Cooper, Julio, Campbell, Hollywood, Sammy, Pascal
Barkley, Montgomery, Harris, Henderson, Gore
Engram, Hurst
1 x 2 3x 1

Given the state of my RBs (COVID) and my lack of TEs, was thinking about pursuing Monty, and Engram.

Would offering
M. Williams, 1, 2
for
Monty, Engram

Be a reasonable starting point?

[Gator Sens]

Way too much in my opinion. I think Williams is the best player in the deal and last night was the first good game we have seen out of Montgomery. I can understand wanting to add a RB, but I dont think this is a good deal.

[SoftwoodGrampian]

Very reasonable, seems fair if you like the players in the deal.

[Edgy68]

I don’t think any of those pieces puts you over top, so to speak. Montgomery has a good schedule ros, but he hasn’t shown enough to be relied upon. Is Engram enough of an upgrade to give away Williams and your 1st? With starting 3-5 WRs, I would think Williams would be a better play and it appears you have enough RBs to whip up enough starters on a weekly basis. I’d roll with what you have rather than sell the future for what might be enough.

[tresskid84]

Way too much in my opinion. I think Williams is the best player in the deal and last night was the first good game we have seen out of Montgomery. I can understand wanting to add a RB, but I dont think this is a good deal.

Monty has scored double digits in 6 of his last 7 games and is actually looking very good this year watching him. I've got him almost 30 spots ahead of Williams in my rankings, and I updated them before this week's games.

Anyway, I do still think its too much. Given its a SF, I'd chop off Williams in the deal entirely and offer offer the 1 and 2 because, even at 1.09, I have the pick a little ahead of Montgomery, but the 2 isn't too far behind Engram for me (again, given its superflex).

[Gator Sens]

Way too much in my opinion. I think Williams is the best player in the deal and last night was the first good game we have seen out of Montgomery. I can understand wanting to add a RB, but I dont think this is a good deal.

Monty has scored double digits in 6 of his last 7 games and is actually looking very good this year watching him. I've got him almost 30 spots ahead of Williams in my rankings, and I updated them before this week's games.

Anyway, I do still think its too much. Given its a SF, I'd chop off Williams in the deal entirely and offer offer the 1 and 2 because, even at 1.09, I have the pick a little ahead of Montgomery, but the 2 isn't too far behind Engram for me (again, given its superflex).

I'm higher on Williams than most and I could see him improving with Herbert at QB. I still think Montgomery is an interesting prospect and value him around a late 1st. Taking Williams out of the deal as you mentioned makes this a much closer deal.

[hawk2119]

Looking at your roster makes me think you're built for the next 2-3 years, just not quite there this year. I'd keep the picks and make a stronger push next year.

[johnnymozart]

I am high on Monty for his stretch run and bullish on him for his career. I'd make that buy, maybe start with just the 1 + Williams for Monty and Engram and pivot to a little more if you need to. Engram also a good long term buy given TE longevity and age/situation. His schedule is also easy rest of way (though now with Colt?)