Dynasty League Football Forum

the_lung wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 2:12 pmI’m still shaking my head at all the people with Clyde-Edwards-Helaire as your 1.01 pick, based almost entirely on landing spot alone. I think that many of these folks are new to dynasty fantasy football or have a poor memory.

dlf_mikeh wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 5:27 am

the_lung wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 2:12 pmI’m still shaking my head at all the people with Clyde-Edwards-Helaire as your 1.01 pick, based almost entirely on landing spot alone. I think that many of these folks are new to dynasty fantasy football or have a poor memory.

The list is fun and I appreciate the time you took to do it. However it seems you're cherry picking data to prove your point. Could I create a list of RBs drafted in that same range who performed well? Or is the data your providing a full list of all RBs chosen from around pick 20-40? I'm genuinely curious.

I put CEH in my top tier well before the draft. Landing spots made him my 1.01. For comparison, I have several dozen posts on these forums that show I think Penny was a bad prospect. When he became a 1st rounder in Seattle, I didn't change my mind.

CEH has great quickness, instincts, and skills. He's on the smaller side and lacks top speed. On running alone, I'd rank him below the top tier because of those two pieces of information. His pass-catching is what pushes him into the top tier for me. Situation vs other RBs nudges him from the top tier into the 1.01.

FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 6:01 am

dlf_mikeh wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 5:27 am

the_lung wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 2:12 pmI’m still shaking my head at all the people with Clyde-Edwards-Helaire as your 1.01 pick, based almost entirely on landing spot alone. I think that many of these folks are new to dynasty fantasy football or have a poor memory.

The list is fun and I appreciate the time you took to do it. However it seems you're cherry picking data to prove your point. Could I create a list of RBs drafted in that same range who performed well? Or is the data your providing a full list of all RBs chosen from around pick 20-40? I'm genuinely curious.

I put CEH in my top tier well before the draft. Landing spots made him my 1.01. For comparison, I have several dozen posts on these forums that show I think Penny was a bad prospect. When he became a 1st rounder in Seattle, I didn't change my mind.

CEH has great quickness, instincts, and skills. He's on the smaller side and lacks top speed. On running alone, I'd rank him below the top tier because of those two pieces of information. His pass-catching is what pushes him into the top tier for me. Situation vs other RBs nudges him from the top tier into the 1.01.

I as well had him in my top tier. I think in full PPR, the argument is strong for him. In half PPR, or standard, I'm not as high on the idea.

Ice wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 6:54 am

FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 6:01 am

dlf_mikeh wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 5:27 am
The list is fun and I appreciate the time you took to do it. However it seems you're cherry picking data to prove your point. Could I create a list of RBs drafted in that same range who performed well? Or is the data your providing a full list of all RBs chosen from around pick 20-40? I'm genuinely curious.

I put CEH in my top tier well before the draft. Landing spots made him my 1.01. For comparison, I have several dozen posts on these forums that show I think Penny was a bad prospect. When he became a 1st rounder in Seattle, I didn't change my mind.

CEH has great quickness, instincts, and skills. He's on the smaller side and lacks top speed. On running alone, I'd rank him below the top tier because of those two pieces of information. His pass-catching is what pushes him into the top tier for me. Situation vs other RBs nudges him from the top tier into the 1.01.

I as well had him in my top tier. I think in full PPR, the argument is strong for him. In half PPR, or standard, I'm not as high on the idea.

Agree with ppr vs less than take.

I had him 3rd in a strong class. I was surprised he went 1st in the class but my top 4 were all close. He is my 1.1 now in full ppr as location for RB's matter to me.

TimeWillTell wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 7:09 am In 0.5PPR, I assume people will favor JT and maybe Dobbins, but how are you guys ranking the top 4 in that scoring system?

Zacsby wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 8:40 am

TimeWillTell wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 7:09 am In 0.5PPR, I assume people will favor JT and maybe Dobbins, but how are you guys ranking the top 4 in that scoring system?

In .5 PPR I'd have it JT, Dobbins, CEH and Swift.

FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 6:01 am

dlf_mikeh wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 5:27 am

the_lung wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 2:12 pmI’m still shaking my head at all the people with Clyde-Edwards-Helaire as your 1.01 pick, based almost entirely on landing spot alone. I think that many of these folks are new to dynasty fantasy football or have a poor memory.

The list is fun and I appreciate the time you took to do it. However it seems you're cherry picking data to prove your point. Could I create a list of RBs drafted in that same range who performed well? Or is the data your providing a full list of all RBs chosen from around pick 20-40? I'm genuinely curious.

I put CEH in my top tier well before the draft. Landing spots made him my 1.01. For comparison, I have several dozen posts on these forums that show I think Penny was a bad prospect. When he became a 1st rounder in Seattle, I didn't change my mind.

CEH has great quickness, instincts, and skills. He's on the smaller side and lacks top speed. On running alone, I'd rank him below the top tier because of those two pieces of information. His pass-catching is what pushes him into the top tier for me. Situation vs other RBs nudges him from the top tier into the 1.01.

I as well had him in my top tier. I think in full PPR, the argument is strong for him. In half PPR, or standard, I'm not as high on the idea.