Dynasty League Football Forum

Owner of Tyreek Hill came to me with this offer

GIVE: 1.03, (Hilton or 1.11) and 1.12

RECEIVE: Hill and Watkins

Looking at my team (in signature) I'm already strong at WR and need to upgrade my RBs, so I was planning on using the 1.03 to draft Taylor, Swift or Dobbins whichever back falls to me. However our league settings allow us to play 1 RB and up to 5 WR+TE, so I could put out a lineup of:

QB: Mahomes
RB: Chubb
WR: Hill, Godwin, Moore and Ridley
TE: Andrews

My reason for possibly making the deal is that the rookie back I draft might not be startable this year depending on where they land.

What do you guys think?

Thanks in advance.

Very cheap for hill imo

I would do this trade as you have Hunt also if Chubb does get hurt....

I would make this deal but try and move Hilton instead of 1.11.

dhanks91 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 8:40 am I would make this deal but try and move Hilton instead of 1.11.

x2

Good deal. Move Hilton

Hilton and 1.11 is a joke lol, snap accept that.

sorry that was 1.03, (1.11 or Hilton) and 1.12 for Hill and Watkins

3 1sts for Hill is too steep for me. Especially with his off-field question marks. No bueno.

Hilton + a 1st I would do but another 1st is way too much.

dhanks91 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 8:40 am I would make this deal but try and move Hilton instead of 1.11.

x2

Adam_172 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 9:04 am Hilton + a 1st I would do but another 1st is way too much.

lol no one is selling a top-5 WR for Hilton + 1st

Adam_172 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 9:04 am Hilton + a 1st I would do but another 1st is way too much.

lol no one is selling a top-5 WR for Hilton + 1st
[/quote]

I get that, I’d open with that return and negotiate from there. Personal preference that I wouldn’t pay 3 1sts for a guy who is probably on his last chance with the league. Hilton probably a late 1st worth at this point, maybe early 2nd, so adding something to that and a 1st is fair but no way another 1st.

Really all comes down to how you feel about the risk factor with Hill. The risk, combined with your need at RB and the strength at the top end of this class has me leaning keep your 1.03 and 1.11.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't worried about Hill's off field issues

Pass- no way would I give 3 -1sts for Hill.

After reading the first few responses, I was going to point out the risks with Hill, but that's been covered. Can they remove Watkins and replace with a flex worthy RB? Would free you to deal 1.3.