Typically, no. Hand times are almost alway faster. It's why Player Profiler adds .05 seconds to pro day times. It's been documented, but the finish its typically fairly accurate, and it takes the brain about .05 seconds or so to trigger the watch once the player starts in motion, so it tends to lend to a faster time. I'm sure there are exceptions, but regardless in this case, Shenault would have really had to develop athletically since HS to blaze a sub 4.4.killer_of_giants wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:02 amnot having a go at you, but i've seen this a lot of times: hand timing is of course unreliable, but why always in the same direction?FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 10:47 am I think his 40 coming into college was a 4.59, and that's hand timed, so really like a 4.64
couldn't it actually be 4.54?
i also don't get why 40 times are so important, if you have the shits or just didn't sleep well you could easily lose some fractions of a second. ok as a broad indication, but not the be all end all it seems to be.
Combine predictions
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27274
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Combine predictions
Last edited by FantasyFreak on Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
-
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:42 pm
Re: Combine predictions
If anything I think the hate fest is for JT. All I hear is that he's got too much mileage and cant catch, plus he's a Wisconsin RB and that his oline made him. Swift seems to be most peoples 1.01 IMO.Johnny B. Goode wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:16 amYou've apparently been missing the giant hate fest going on with Swift in forums (not this one) and Twitter. It started with PFF. The trendy thing to say is that Swift is no better than RB3 or even RB4 in this classOhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 10:44 amInteresting take considering his rookie ADP is already 1.01 and his startup ADP is 27th. How high do you think he’ll rise after the combine?
His combine will remind those people why he is the 1.01
10 Team .5 PPR 1 QB League
QB: Goff, Brady, Herbert, Tannehill
RB: CEH, JT, Akers, Dobbins, Mixon
WR: Adams, Godwin, McLaurin, Lamb, Chark, Claypool, Pittman, Diontae, Anderson
TE: Andrews, Goedert
Picks:
2021: 4 1sts, 1 2nd
2022: 1 1st, 2 2nds
QB: Goff, Brady, Herbert, Tannehill
RB: CEH, JT, Akers, Dobbins, Mixon
WR: Adams, Godwin, McLaurin, Lamb, Chark, Claypool, Pittman, Diontae, Anderson
TE: Andrews, Goedert
Picks:
2021: 4 1sts, 1 2nd
2022: 1 1st, 2 2nds
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27274
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Combine predictions
What do you expect him to do? I'm curious, because Dobbins and Taylor seem to be top end athletes, themselves. I don't think there is a real 1.01, at this point, just curious what you think he's going to do at the combine that puts him there.Johnny B. Goode wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:16 amYou've apparently been missing the giant hate fest going on with Swift in forums (not this one) and Twitter. It started with PFF. The trendy thing to say is that Swift is no better than RB3 or even RB4 in this classOhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 10:44 amInteresting take considering his rookie ADP is already 1.01 and his startup ADP is 27th. How high do you think he’ll rise after the combine?
His combine will remind those people why he is the 1.01
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:33 pm
Re: Combine predictions
Yeah, I’m also curious. I’m not sure Swift is going to separate from those two guys athletically.FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:26 amWhat do you expect him to do? I'm curious, because Dobbins and Taylor seem to be top end athletes, themselves. I don't think there is a real 1.01, at this point, just curious what you think he's going to do at the combine that puts him there.Johnny B. Goode wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:16 amYou've apparently been missing the giant hate fest going on with Swift in forums (not this one) and Twitter. It started with PFF. The trendy thing to say is that Swift is no better than RB3 or even RB4 in this classOhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 10:44 am
Interesting take considering his rookie ADP is already 1.01 and his startup ADP is 27th. How high do you think he’ll rise after the combine?
His combine will remind those people why he is the 1.01
COOGAN IS A CHEATER AND A THIEF
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27274
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Combine predictions
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
- killer_of_giants
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:20 am
Re: Combine predictions
cheers!FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:20 amTypically, no. Hand times are almost alway faster. It's why Player Profiler adds .05 seconds to pro day times. It's been documented, but the finish its typically fairly accurate, and it takes the brain about .05 seconds or so to trigger the watch once the player starts in motion, so it tends to lend to a faster time. I'm sure there are accessions, but regardless in this case, Shenault would have really had to develop athletically since HS to blaze a sub 4.4.killer_of_giants wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:02 amnot having a go at you, but i've seen this a lot of times: hand timing is of course unreliable, but why always in the same direction?FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 10:47 am I think his 40 coming into college was a 4.59, and that's hand timed, so really like a 4.64
couldn't it actually be 4.54?
i also don't get why 40 times are so important, if you have the shits or just didn't sleep well you could easily lose some fractions of a second. ok as a broad indication, but not the be all end all it seems to be.
i imagined both the runner and the "timer" would start on the same audio signal taking that offset out.
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27274
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Combine predictions
No worries. I don't know why I typed accessions, it meant to say exceptions. Anyway, It is possible in 3 years Shenault has become much more athletic, he just wasn't a fantastic athlete coming out of High School.killer_of_giants wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:42 amcheers!FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:20 amTypically, no. Hand times are almost alway faster. It's why Player Profiler adds .05 seconds to pro day times. It's been documented, but the finish its typically fairly accurate, and it takes the brain about .05 seconds or so to trigger the watch once the player starts in motion, so it tends to lend to a faster time. I'm sure there are accessions, but regardless in this case, Shenault would have really had to develop athletically since HS to blaze a sub 4.4.killer_of_giants wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:02 am
not having a go at you, but i've seen this a lot of times: hand timing is of course unreliable, but why always in the same direction?
couldn't it actually be 4.54?
i also don't get why 40 times are so important, if you have the shits or just didn't sleep well you could easily lose some fractions of a second. ok as a broad indication, but not the be all end all it seems to be.
i imagined both the runner and the "timer" would start on the same audio signal taking that offset out.
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2684
- Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 6:26 pm
- Location: Nagoya, JP
Re: Combine predictions
Thanks. We will see how solid they are soon haha.
My prediction isn't so much that he blows up the combine, but more that he hits good numbers across the board. I don't think he's going to be the fastest, highest jumper, but the collective package could be impressive.FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 10:47 am
I question how much of an athlete he (Shenault) really is. I think his 40 coming into college was a 4.59, and that's hand timed, so really like a 4.64, and he had a 31 inch vertical. Obviously he's gotten bigger and stronger, but I just don't know that he blows up the combine as some are predicting.
It's not uncommon for guys to shave 0.1-0.2s of their 40 from HS to the combine. Vertical, I'm not so sure.
Btw, Where do you find HS workout numbers? I've seen them on 247 recruiting site, but they are pretty tedious to look through in my experience. I'd love to hear about a better resource.
Dynasty player since 2002.
I probably should have done something more productive with that time...
I probably should have done something more productive with that time...
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27274
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Combine predictions
This is where I got Laviska's from.ColdZealDonkeyStrike wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 12:05 pmThanks. We will see how solid they are soon haha.
My prediction isn't so much that he blows up the combine, but more that he hits good numbers across the board. I don't think he's going to be the fastest, highest jumper, but the collective package could be impressive.FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 10:47 am
I question how much of an athlete he (Shenault) really is. I think his 40 coming into college was a 4.59, and that's hand timed, so really like a 4.64, and he had a 31 inch vertical. Obviously he's gotten bigger and stronger, but I just don't know that he blows up the combine as some are predicting.
It's not uncommon for guys to shave 0.1-0.2s of their 40 from HS to the combine. Vertical, I'm not so sure.
Btw, Where do you find HS workout numbers? I've seen them on 247 recruiting site, but they are pretty tedious to look through in my experience. I'd love to hear about a better resource.
http://www.espn.com/college-sports/foot ... henault-jr
Here is Dobbins, who I also mentioned earlier.
http://www.espn.com/college-sports/foot ... jk-dobbins
They've both put on weight, so it's tough to gauge how that will affect the results next week, but as you can see, Dobbins was a premier athlete at the time, and they were both at basically the same weight when they tested.
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
Re: Combine predictions
They also likely haven’t been on high end athletic training programs in HS, or fully formed athletes at 17-18 vs 21-23 years old. Also technique is a huge part of running the 40, and just a bad stance or release can really rack up FRACTIONS of a second, but these guys are all training with workout gurus and performance centers preparing for the combine to get in the best shape possible, and learn the optimal form for performing in these events.
I put zero stock in HS 40 times, we'll find out soon enough how they actually test.
I put zero stock in HS 40 times, we'll find out soon enough how they actually test.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2018 1:18 pm
Re: Combine predictions
Dobbins stands to be the sparq darling. Taylor is going to run pretty well but about what people expect. Swift, IMO runs a 4.45 40, which when you add up everything else he can do he should be 1.01 hands down. I never understand how people let the combine affect their rankings a great deal. I'm most interested in height, weight, and if anyone runs over a 4.5 40.OhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:31 amYeah, I’m also curious. I’m not sure Swift is going to separate from those two guys athletically.FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:26 amWhat do you expect him to do? I'm curious, because Dobbins and Taylor seem to be top end athletes, themselves. I don't think there is a real 1.01, at this point, just curious what you think he's going to do at the combine that puts him there.Johnny B. Goode wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:16 am
You've apparently been missing the giant hate fest going on with Swift in forums (not this one) and Twitter. It started with PFF. The trendy thing to say is that Swift is no better than RB3 or even RB4 in this class
His combine will remind those people why he is the 1.01
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27274
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Combine predictions
Fair. What if Swift comes in smaller. Like 5 ft 8, 210 pounds? What does that do for you?Johnny B. Goode wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 2:54 pmDobbins stands to be the sparq darling. Taylor is going to run pretty well but about what people expect. Swift, IMO runs a 4.45 40, which when you add up everything else he can do he should be 1.01 hands down. I never understand how people let the combine affect their rankings a great deal. I'm most interested in height, weight, and if anyone runs over a 4.5 40.OhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:31 amYeah, I’m also curious. I’m not sure Swift is going to separate from those two guys athletically.FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:26 am
What do you expect him to do? I'm curious, because Dobbins and Taylor seem to be top end athletes, themselves. I don't think there is a real 1.01, at this point, just curious what you think he's going to do at the combine that puts him there.
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
-
- Starter
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2018 1:18 pm
Re: Combine predictions
that's a pretty solid rb bmiFantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 3:13 pmFair. What if Swift comes in smaller. Like 5 ft 8, 210 pounds? What does that do for you?Johnny B. Goode wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 2:54 pmDobbins stands to be the sparq darling. Taylor is going to run pretty well but about what people expect. Swift, IMO runs a 4.45 40, which when you add up everything else he can do he should be 1.01 hands down. I never understand how people let the combine affect their rankings a great deal. I'm most interested in height, weight, and if anyone runs over a 4.5 40.OhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 11:31 am
Yeah, I’m also curious. I’m not sure Swift is going to separate from those two guys athletically.
Swift stands to have one of, if not the best bmi of the top 3 rbs.
-
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:42 pm
Re: Combine predictions
5'8" 210 lbs seems small to me, and he had a shoulder problem already this year. I would be very concerned, but that's just me.
10 Team .5 PPR 1 QB League
QB: Goff, Brady, Herbert, Tannehill
RB: CEH, JT, Akers, Dobbins, Mixon
WR: Adams, Godwin, McLaurin, Lamb, Chark, Claypool, Pittman, Diontae, Anderson
TE: Andrews, Goedert
Picks:
2021: 4 1sts, 1 2nd
2022: 1 1st, 2 2nds
QB: Goff, Brady, Herbert, Tannehill
RB: CEH, JT, Akers, Dobbins, Mixon
WR: Adams, Godwin, McLaurin, Lamb, Chark, Claypool, Pittman, Diontae, Anderson
TE: Andrews, Goedert
Picks:
2021: 4 1sts, 1 2nd
2022: 1 1st, 2 2nds
Re: Combine predictions
Emmitt Smith 5’ 9” 210. Just saying....Packerland wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2020 3:51 pm 5'8" 210 lbs seems small to me, and he had a shoulder problem already this year. I would be very concerned, but that's just me.
You Worry too much. Smith was a beast playing with a bad shoulder one year.
The Clock is Running and there are no Timeouts
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], BlackOmega, BradyT, mild, trc and 35 guests