https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/viewtopic.php?t=190200
I imagine this is a joke, Juju had 111 for 1400 last year Sharing the ball with the best WR in the league
Sharing the ball with the best WR in the league probably worked out in JuJu's favor.Nanananananana wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:30 pmI imagine this is a joke, Juju had 111 for 1400 last year Sharing the ball with the best WR in the league
Lockett is cute but couldn’t wish to put up numbers like that playing next to a bunch of scrubs.
Really some pure nonsense right there.
It's just fact that Lockett is better. Look at Locketts ridiculous efficiency on the field. Juju looks a little lost without Brown taking top coverage from him. I stayed away from Juju for this reason, because I thought he couldn't handle top coverage. If we looked into the production per target between the two, I bet Lockett would have better career numbers.Nanananananana wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:30 pmI imagine this is a joke, Juju had 111 for 1400 last year Sharing the ball with the best WR in the league
Lockett is cute but couldn’t wish to put up numbers like that playing next to a bunch of scrubs.
Really some pure nonsense right there.
I believe what you really meant to say here is.. Russel Wilson > Ben Roethlisberger.TheNuts wrote: ↑Sat Oct 05, 2019 4:13 amIt's just fact that Lockett is better. Look at Locketts ridiculous efficiency on the field. Juju looks a little lost without Brown taking top coverage from him. I stayed away from Juju for this reason, because I thought he couldn't handle top coverage. If we looked into the production per target between the two, I bet Lockett would have better career numbers.Nanananananana wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:30 pmI imagine this is a joke, Juju had 111 for 1400 last year Sharing the ball with the best WR in the league
Lockett is cute but couldn’t wish to put up numbers like that playing next to a bunch of scrubs.
Really some pure nonsense right there.
Juju isn't bad, but Lockett is just really good. Put Lockett in an offense that throws more often, and he would be talked about in the no brainer top 5s of WRs
Although I agree Lockett is probably better, considering Juju's production at only age 22, I think he's much more valuable and could definetly become a top 5 wr by the time he hits the "usual" prime yearsTheNuts wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 2:41 am
It's just fact that Lockett is better. Look at Locketts ridiculous efficiency on the field. Juju looks a little lost without Brown taking top coverage from him. I stayed away from Juju for this reason, because I thought he couldn't handle top coverage. If we looked into the production per target between the two, I bet Lockett would have better career numbers.
Juju isn't bad, but Lockett is just really good. Put Lockett in an offense that throws more often, and he would be talked about in the no brainer top 5s of WRs
It's pretty clear he was talking about actual NFL ability, not who is a better fantasy asset. There is certainly a reasonable argument for it.Nanananananana wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:30 pmI imagine this is a joke, Juju had 111 for 1400 last year Sharing the ball with the best WR in the league
Lockett is cute but couldn’t wish to put up numbers like that playing next to a bunch of scrubs.
Really some pure nonsense right there.
Let’s not hi jack this thread let’s take it to the ‘Lockett is the greatest receiver ever, I wish they would throw him the ball every play’ thread.Vcize wrote: ↑Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:42 amIt's pretty clear he was talking about actual NFL ability, not who is a better fantasy asset. There is certainly a reasonable argument for it.Nanananananana wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:30 pmI imagine this is a joke, Juju had 111 for 1400 last year Sharing the ball with the best WR in the league
Lockett is cute but couldn’t wish to put up numbers like that playing next to a bunch of scrubs.
Really some pure nonsense right there.
I think that's a bit cheap. I feel like it's worth taking the gamble on Teddy if you can't get a 2nd straight up. Maybe not though. What do i know?
Wow, thanks man. Always great to get trade feedback.kmbryant09 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2019 7:51 amThat's a great, great trade especially for a rebuild. You got a young potential franchise QB, a young potential building-block RB, and a 1st round pick in a loaded draft class....all for a 30-year-old WR and a handcuff RB.pvillebiker wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 7:27 pm Gave: Julio + Malcom Brown
Got: Darnold + Sanders + 2020 1st
In SF - time to rebuild. My QB's are Cam + Brady, RB's are Gurley, Sony, WR's are AB, Cooks, Julio (b4 the trade).
Well done.
I like trade #2 in a Superflex, but think you sold Gurley low. Should have been able to get at least a promising young player + 2020 1st for him. Hope you hit on that pick!pvillebiker wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2019 3:23 pmWow, thanks man. Always great to get trade feedback.kmbryant09 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2019 7:51 amThat's a great, great trade especially for a rebuild. You got a young potential franchise QB, a young potential building-block RB, and a 1st round pick in a loaded draft class....all for a 30-year-old WR and a handcuff RB.pvillebiker wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 7:27 pm Gave: Julio + Malcom Brown
Got: Darnold + Sanders + 2020 1st
In SF - time to rebuild. My QB's are Cam + Brady, RB's are Gurley, Sony, WR's are AB, Cooks, Julio (b4 the trade).
Well done.
Made 2 more in the same league. Really unsure about the Gurley one, but wth it's rebuild city!
Trade #2
Gave: Sony Michel + Jaylen Samuels
Got: Josh Allen
Trade #3
Gave: Gurley
Got: 2020 1st (probably mid'ish) from the team that finished 2nd from bottom last year. His RB's are Mixon, Jacobs and now Gurley. WR's are Adams, Sammy, Woods, Ridley. QB's are Lamar Jackson, Mariota and Rudolph. So it's a calculated risk that I'm betting breaks my way, but we'll see.