This is why game study is an important aspect of rookie drafts. Austin was fed a high volume of manufactured touches and was not an advanced or even good route runner. Austin didn't fail because of size; he failed because he never got better.JFever wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:58 amWould your REALLY use the 1.04 pick on a wr that weighs 166lbs? Heck, if he was 176lb I'd still be concerned. I remember lots of folks banging the drum for Tavon Austin. He was fast, electric, multi talented, dynamic, a game changer etc.... That didn't work out so hot. I like that he runs good routes and is smart, and can catch. If he didn't or couldn't; he wouldnt have been able to play at the NCAA level. The NFL is a different beast though. At 166 lbs. He will be hurt / injured often. WAY too often to spend a 1.04. I'd consider him in the mid 2nd. Any early - I'm not interested. I have some limits and 166lbs is just too light for my comfort levels. I'll let someone else draft him and deal with the potential upside AND the potential wasted pick. I can live with that just fine.
166 lbs.... No way.
Weight isn't a permanent stat. You really shouldn't base your criticism of a player around it, especially when players are winning in the NFL at 175-185 pounds. A 185 lb RB just ran for 1000 yards. What's more important is if he can play WR...and he's really, really good at playing WR. It's not hard to gain weight, but it's hard to teach players how to run routes and get open like that.