I like the suggestions "guest editor maybeMR ROURKE wrote:First let me say that I enjoy this site. I've been playing FF for a long time and have been on countless other FF sites and forums. This forum has become my favorite to go to. The Essentials guide is well laid and and well presented.
My suggestions go to the rankings themselves. I love the contending and rebuilding rankings. That is great and I've only seen this on very few other sites. The rankings appear to be a value guide, but not taylored to PPR or non-PPR. Being a dynasty FF based site, I would expect you to make rankings taylored to the two main scoring systems in FF. I find it strange that you don't offer seperate PPR and non-PPR rankings. If you really want blow people away... PPR contender/rebuilding and non-PPR contender/rebuilding, but lets not get crazy.
I have a similar suggestion for IDP rankings. In a perfect world, there would be IDP rankings for scoring systems that are tackle only or tackle + low big play scoring. Plus a seperate ranking for leagues that give 6+ points for sacks and interceptions. There can be a pretty decent difference in some players value depending on how big plays are considered in IDP rankings.I come to this site to talk FF with knowledgable people. However, I'd estimate is that most people who stumble across FF sites are in search of FF rankings. I would think that impressing those searching for FF rankings is one the best ways to gain more committed followers and steal other sites committed followers. My guess is that rankings bring people to a FF site, liking the rankings gets them reading the site, and the forum/articles keeps them coming back.I'd like to see the LB rankings go to at least 60 since Lb's are the most owned defensive player.
" Maybe for the 3.0 expanded LB rankings!!!
I wish I could be in the NFL at the age of 16...
