Page 1 of 2
Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 8:49 am
by Dynasty19
I was just offered Jarvis Landry for my 2019 1.6 and 2.7. A year ago I would have snap accepted this. Is this still the case or are you starting to get worried about his usage in Cleveland and baker spreading the ball out?
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:17 am
by Crwdstunna
I vote for the picks. Guessing that’ll be the minority.
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:19 am
by Jigga94
Jarvis, but it's fair
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:39 am
by Titans95
i'd rather have Jarvis, it either needs to be a slightly earlier 1st or a earlier 2nd added to the 1.6
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:07 am
by lukkynumber13
Landry easily
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:18 am
by saw061600
x2. Everyone talking about Baker is going to be a stud but it makes sense to think Landry is now going to bust? Crazy talk, get Landry.
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 2:20 pm
by Jigga94
saw061600 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:18 am
x2. Everyone talking about Baker is going to be a stud but it makes sense to think Landry is now going to bust? Crazy talk, get Landry.
It's a little backwards isn't it? Baker does spread it around a lot more than Tannehill though
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:49 pm
by Titans95
Jigga94 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 25, 2018 2:20 pm
saw061600 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:18 am
x2. Everyone talking about Baker is going to be a stud but it makes sense to think Landry is now going to bust? Crazy talk, get Landry.
It's a little backwards isn't it? Baker does spread it around a lot more than Tannehill though
It looks like the browns actually have a competent coaching staff now and that makes me think they will use Landry like he's supposed to be used in 2019. Haley tried to force Landry into an AB role on the outside but that has never been nor will be Landry's game. He's an elite slot receiver and that's where he needs to stay. Hopefully the new OC will understand that and rework the offense this offseason when there is time as I assume he was basically using Haley's scheme but reworking as much of it as he could on the fly.
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 10:50 pm
by honcho55
I bought Landry for a playoff push for 1.03, which I think was a tiny overpay.
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:20 pm
by keebs3
I'll take Landry- I believe he'll have a better 2019. But it would also depend on my roster and situation to be sure.
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:28 am
by Draft Master
I traded the 1.05 for him last year, and would do the same again this year if given the chance!
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 8:05 am
by BigBawseRoss
landry by a good bit for me
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 8:07 am
by fruity pebbles
Landry. Think this draft class falls off quickly
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 11:01 am
by DLF_TylerK
If it were 1.03 or 1.04 plus I’d say it’s fair but I don’t see 6 great players in this class. Take Landry here.
Re: Jarvis or 1.6+
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 2:51 am
by jeaton6
Surprised to see Landry in a landslide. Baker spreads it around a ton, Landry was pretty inconsistent this year, inconsistent usage, had 4 OT games to pad his stats and yet sitting at WR21 in PPR, WR27 PPG. To me his value is way down given all this and I wasn’t paying 1.6 for him last year. I really don’t see how he’s worth it+ now (even given the supposed “weak” 2019 class). I’d be very happy to move him for a mid 1, but doubt I could get it for him. The picks will gain value this offseason, I doubt Landry will.