Dynasty League Football Forum

People who are downplaying juju on this are going to look very, very, VERY foolish in the very near future.
It's literally historically unprecedented what juju is accomplishing at a ridiculously young age.

You'd have to add to Julio to get Juju from me.

I will gladly take Juju and the almost 8 year age gap between the two players 100 times out of 100.

I know looking at this in hindsight makes it seem bad, but this just as easily could've been Corey Davis instead of Juju as many people had the two of them very similarly this past offseason in my experience.

I now realize this is an old thread...

This reminds me of all the old threads that said to refuse to trade AJG for anything less than 3-4 mid/high firsts.
I traded him for Juju, Ebron, Mahomes and two 2019 2nds last offseason and was ROASTED.
I'm enjoying spending my championship winnings this week from that team.

Mjvb5 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:34 pm I know looking at this in hindsight makes it seem bad, but this just as easily could've been Corey Davis instead of Juju as many people had the two of them very similarly this past offseason in my experience.

This comment will likely seem off base next offseason.

It is very confusing when people bump old threads, wish there was a way to highlight the thread started a while ago.

With that being said, this is exactly why vetoes should not be allowed in a dynasty league. Everyone who responded said the OP was crazy to trade Julio for Juju+Kittle. last off season I may have agreed. In a veto league, this deal would have most likely been vetoed if someone tried to do it. Now fast forward 9 months, and the Juju+Kittle side is the easier winner as of now.

Besides collusion, where both owners should be removed, vetoes should never be used.