Any owners of TO out there have thoughts on where they would like to see him land?
I own D-Mac too so I was stoked when I heard D-Mac endorsing the Skins bringing him in.
I would like to see the Skins or Bears sign him. I am warming up to the idea of the Raiders too now that Campbell is the QB.
TO's Landing Spot
TO's Landing Spot
10 Team - 12 player (for as long as we want) keeper league.
Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 2 RB/WR, 1TE, 1 K, 1 Def
6 pts All TD's, Decimal Point Scoring for Yardage (.05/yd Passing, .1/yd Rush/Rec)
12 Keepers:
QB-Brady, Dalton, Tannehill
RB-Charles, Alf Morris, Ridley
WR-Jordy, Cobb, Andre2K, Floyd, Colston
TE-Witten
Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 2 RB/WR, 1TE, 1 K, 1 Def
6 pts All TD's, Decimal Point Scoring for Yardage (.05/yd Passing, .1/yd Rush/Rec)
12 Keepers:
QB-Brady, Dalton, Tannehill
RB-Charles, Alf Morris, Ridley
WR-Jordy, Cobb, Andre2K, Floyd, Colston
TE-Witten
-
kris_kapsner
- Legend
- Posts: 5494
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:56 am
- Location: Duluth, MN
I don't think TO finds a job until training camp is underway, if ever. His skills on the field now just don't out weigh his locker room virus. He can still play. But, it wouldn't surprise me to see him without a job watching football on Sundays from his driveway while doing sit ups and complaining to the media that he was pushed out of football.
16 team PPR Est. 2002 (Champion: 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2016)
Start: QB, 2-4WR, 2-3RB, 1-2TE, K, D
QB: Russell Wilson, Zach Wilson
RB: Barkley, Mixon, Chubb, Hunt, G. Bernard
WR: Adams, Metcalf, Callaway, Shepard, Watkins, Fuller, T. Williams, Proche
TE: Kelce, Pitts, Njoku, Seals-Jones
K: Gay
D: Vikings
Start: QB, 2-4WR, 2-3RB, 1-2TE, K, D
QB: Russell Wilson, Zach Wilson
RB: Barkley, Mixon, Chubb, Hunt, G. Bernard
WR: Adams, Metcalf, Callaway, Shepard, Watkins, Fuller, T. Williams, Proche
TE: Kelce, Pitts, Njoku, Seals-Jones
K: Gay
D: Vikings
I would be very surprised if Owens isn't in some uniform on Sunday. He can still play and was a victim of being in Buffalo. While he certainly is a distraction we aren't talking about a guy with drug problems or trouble with the law. Teams have taken shots on guys were far more character issues and liklihood of being suspended, than him.
He'll play somewhere and he'll make that team better.
He'll play somewhere and he'll make that team better.
I agree! He's still a big target and can be productive as long as a team isn't relying on him as a WR1 anymore, more like a WR3 I think. Buffalo last year was one of the worst situations we've seen for a receiver in awhile (Which could actually get WORSE this year in Buffalo as TO has been replaced by a bunch of rookie WRsOrca wrote:I would be very surprised if Owens isn't in some uniform on Sunday. He can still play and was a victim of being in Buffalo. While he certainly is a distraction we aren't talking about a guy with drug problems or trouble with the law. Teams have taken shots on guys were far more character issues and liklihood of being suspended, than him.
He'll play somewhere and he'll make that team better.
)“I had a couple of drinks. I started in 1970 and finished in 1985. It was a very big drink.” - Alice Cooper
“I’m sick to death of people saying we’ve made 11 albums that sound exactly the same. In fact, we’ve made 12 albums that sound exactly the same.” - Angus Young of AC/DC
"Every album Van Halen did was actually an Eddie solo album" - Eddie Van Halen
"Don't hate me because I'm fabulous" - Prince
“I’m sick to death of people saying we’ve made 11 albums that sound exactly the same. In fact, we’ve made 12 albums that sound exactly the same.” - Angus Young of AC/DC
"Every album Van Halen did was actually an Eddie solo album" - Eddie Van Halen
"Don't hate me because I'm fabulous" - Prince
-
Wolfjack
- Charter Member
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:19 pm
- Location: Waterloo, Ontario CANADA
So if you subscribe to the belief that he is of value for a year. what's his trade value? Rookie pick in the second? Third?Shawn wrote:I agree! He's still a big target and can be productive as long as a team isn't relying on him as a WR1 anymore, more like a WR3 I think. Buffalo last year was one of the worst situations we've seen for a receiver in awhile (Which could actually get WORSE this year in Buffalo as TO has been replaced by a bunch of rookie WRsOrca wrote:I would be very surprised if Owens isn't in some uniform on Sunday. He can still play and was a victim of being in Buffalo. While he certainly is a distraction we aren't talking about a guy with drug problems or trouble with the law. Teams have taken shots on guys were far more character issues and liklihood of being suspended, than him.
He'll play somewhere and he'll make that team better.
Lee Deline
2006 United Dynasty League Inaugural Champion
GM of Waterloo Wolves - Member of the United Dynasty League
GM of Waterloo Bandits - Commissioner of the Premier Dynasty League
GM of Waterloo Reapers - Member of the DLF Charter League
GM of Waterloo Storm - Member of the DLF Charter League II
2006 United Dynasty League Inaugural Champion
GM of Waterloo Wolves - Member of the United Dynasty League
GM of Waterloo Bandits - Commissioner of the Premier Dynasty League
GM of Waterloo Reapers - Member of the DLF Charter League
GM of Waterloo Storm - Member of the DLF Charter League II
-
Steelersfan
- GOAT
- Posts: 15249
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:38 pm
- Contact:
I'd pay as much as a mid to late 2nd for Owens if I needed a WR3 for a championship run.Wolfjack wrote:So if you subscribe to the belief that he is of value for a year. what's his trade value? Rookie pick in the second? Third?Shawn wrote:I agree! He's still a big target and can be productive as long as a team isn't relying on him as a WR1 anymore, more like a WR3 I think. Buffalo last year was one of the worst situations we've seen for a receiver in awhile (Which could actually get WORSE this year in Buffalo as TO has been replaced by a bunch of rookie WRsOrca wrote:I would be very surprised if Owens isn't in some uniform on Sunday. He can still play and was a victim of being in Buffalo. While he certainly is a distraction we aren't talking about a guy with drug problems or trouble with the law. Teams have taken shots on guys were far more character issues and liklihood of being suspended, than him.
He'll play somewhere and he'll make that team better.
That seems about right. It is good time to move, when he gets signed by someone his value will go up.Steelersfan wrote:I'd pay as much as a mid to late 2nd for Owens if I needed a WR3 for a championship run.Wolfjack wrote:So if you subscribe to the belief that he is of value for a year. what's his trade value? Rookie pick in the second? Third?Shawn wrote: I agree! He's still a big target and can be productive as long as a team isn't relying on him as a WR1 anymore, more like a WR3 I think. Buffalo last year was one of the worst situations we've seen for a receiver in awhile (Which could actually get WORSE this year in Buffalo as TO has been replaced by a bunch of rookie WRs
That might hurt my fellow little man's Mike Thomas of having a large roll out there, so I don't like it. But it is a pretty good fit.haydn239 wrote:how do people feel about Jacksonville as a potential landing spot opposite Sims-Walker!
Before the draft I thought that Carolina would be a really good fit for him, opposite S. Smith. I still think it is, since I am don't think Lafell will make a big impact, at least not this year.
-
Steelersfan
- GOAT
- Posts: 15249
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:38 pm
- Contact:
NFL Network's Steve Wyche reports that the Seahawks made "an exploratory phone call" about free agent Terrell Owens earlier this offseason.
It sounds like this was before rookie Golden Tate began lighting up minicamp. Wyche acknowledges that the current extent of Seattle's interest in T.O. is unknown, but reports that the rumored Owens-Raiders marriage "is not going to happen" at this time. The Raiders are reportedly confident that the light will flip on for 2009 No. 7 overall pick Darrius Heyward-Bey. Rotoworld
It sounds like this was before rookie Golden Tate began lighting up minicamp. Wyche acknowledges that the current extent of Seattle's interest in T.O. is unknown, but reports that the rumored Owens-Raiders marriage "is not going to happen" at this time. The Raiders are reportedly confident that the light will flip on for 2009 No. 7 overall pick Darrius Heyward-Bey. Rotoworld
-
blacksheep
- Player of the Year
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:44 pm
- Location: Hi-Line
Like they waited for a certain 1st round QB/NGSteelersfan wrote:NFL Network's Steve Wyche reports that the Seahawks made "an exploratory phone call" about free agent Terrell Owens earlier this offseason.
It sounds like this was before rookie Golden Tate began lighting up minicamp. Wyche acknowledges that the current extent of Seattle's interest in T.O. is unknown, but reports that the rumored Owens-Raiders marriage "is not going to happen" at this time. The Raiders are reportedly confident that the light will flip on for 2009 No. 7 overall pick Darrius Heyward-Bey. Rotoworld
-
Steelersfan
- GOAT
- Posts: 15249
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:38 pm
- Contact:
After the Bills failed to offer him a June 1 tender, wide receiver Terrell Owens officially became an unrestricted free agent, according to Aaron Wilson of the National Football Post.
Our View: Any club can now sign him free of consequence. Of course, you're never really free of consequence if you are signing Terrell Owens. It could be a while before he finds himself under contract for the 2010 season. Fanball
Our View: Any club can now sign him free of consequence. Of course, you're never really free of consequence if you are signing Terrell Owens. It could be a while before he finds himself under contract for the 2010 season. Fanball
jacksonville is a good spot from him. not a huge media centrehaydn239 wrote:how do people feel about Jacksonville as a potential landing spot opposite Sims-Walker!
QB - DWatson(HOU)Minshew(JAX)Darnold(NYJ)
RB -NChubb(CLE)DHenry(TEN)JTaylor(IND)Gurley(ATL)
WR -DHopkins(ARI)ACooper(DAL)CGodwin(TB)OBJ(CLE)
TE - HHenry(SD)DGoeddart(PHI)
K - Zurlien(LAR)Crosby(GB)
Def - ARI DAL
[rookie] Haskins(WAS)DSwift(DET)Jefferson(MIN)MHardman(KC)
7th pick in 2021
Rosters must always be 3qbs 4wrs 4rbs 2tes 2kickers 2dst and protected players don't take up a roster spot, but are only for rookie/2nd-year players that were drafted
RB -NChubb(CLE)DHenry(TEN)JTaylor(IND)Gurley(ATL)
WR -DHopkins(ARI)ACooper(DAL)CGodwin(TB)OBJ(CLE)
TE - HHenry(SD)DGoeddart(PHI)
K - Zurlien(LAR)Crosby(GB)
Def - ARI DAL
[rookie] Haskins(WAS)DSwift(DET)Jefferson(MIN)MHardman(KC)
7th pick in 2021
Rosters must always be 3qbs 4wrs 4rbs 2tes 2kickers 2dst and protected players don't take up a roster spot, but are only for rookie/2nd-year players that were drafted
Yeah I agree. Brandon LaFell's hands are really small so TO would be an upgrade obviouslyOrca wrote:Jacksonville would make sense. So would Carolina, opposite S. Smith.MrUbuto wrote:jacksonville is a good spot from him. not a huge media centrehaydn239 wrote:how do people feel about Jacksonville as a potential landing spot opposite Sims-Walker!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests