Funchess for Buck&Dixon to Forsett owner

[Alibaba]

Trying to bulid Wr depth and i like funchess just wondering thoughts on this offer i am sending out?

[knotts4372]

im not super huge on any of these players but if you have dixon you likely took him 1st rd this year so in theory he should be worth funchess on his own. that being said im not buying any ravens players so if you can get funchess id grab it honestly

[Alibaba]

This offer still sits and funchess news keeps coming i added a 2017 3rd so now its dixon,buck,3rd for funchess should i just pull back?

[thriftyrocker]

I like Funchess but don't think he'll break out this year, just start showing. A month ago it would have taken 2 Funchess'es to get just Dixon and Dixon has only looked good and had good news. Only negative for him is West also looks good, so it is a definite timeshare. The point is you're putting together a package that should net any non-elite WR, and you're aiming a little low. If Funchess is who you want, that's fine, but you could try for Floyd or Moncrief with the same package, and don't limit yourself to just the Forsett owner, half the league wants Dixon.

[derekhiny]

I would want something other than Buck in the deal for me to accept. Owning an entire backfield seems to be SO overrated on these boards at times. Why would anyone want 3 RBs from the same team? What's the point? You're wasting two bench spots on guys who you will never use. At least one anyways. I can understand using up a roster spot for the primary handcuff, but using up another roster spot for the handcuff to the handcuff? Such a waste of a roster spot. I'd much rather use that 3rd spot on a dart throw that at least has some upside. And if the argument is that we don't really know who the starter or primary handcuff is so we should own all 3, based off that assumption, I can just as easily make the argument that none are worth owning and the backfield should be avoided entirely.

[The.Big.Spank]

I would want something other than Buck in the deal for me to accept. Owning an entire backfield seems to be SO overrated on these boards at times. Why would anyone want 3 RBs from the same team? What's the point? You're wasting two bench spots on guys who you will never use. At least one anyways. I can understand using up a roster spot for the primary handcuff, but using up another roster spot for the handcuff to the handcuff? Such a waste of a roster spot. I'd much rather use that 3rd spot on a dart throw that at least has some upside. And if the argument is that we don't really know who the starter or primary handcuff is so we should own all 3, based off that assumption, I can just as easily make the argument that none are worth owning and the backfield should be avoided entirely.

This plus I would not trade Funchess for what you are offering.