Malcom Mitchell or Jordon Howard?

[yosemityjn]

My pick is 2 away in a offline. I am in a 14 team league staring 3Rb's, 3Wr's, 1 flex, PPR. This team is a rebuild. Your opinions are appreciated. Thanks

[Walter Sobchak]

In a rebuild I would go mitchell

[derekhiny]

Howard

[franklin43]

In a rebuild I would go mitchell

I would for sure go mitchell in a rebuild. I would think for a while in a championship run and probably still take mitchell.

[bigbuck22]

I probably rank Howard a little ahead of Mitchell, although very close. The fact that you have to start 3 RBs makes me think Howard is the better choice for your team.

[BelichekYourSelf]

Mitchell

[jimmycricket14]

Howard. There is a chance he can have RB3/4 value right out of the gate if he gets all the goal line work and a decent amount of early down work. In a league that starts 3 RB's there will be some RB hungry contender when the injuries start to pile up mid season that you will come calling for Howard. Mitchell, while maybe the better long term asset, is less likely to appreciate in value during this season and into next offseason.

[RightlegTucker]

Mitchell, comparatively I think he is the better talent.

[Jason3123]

Howard for me. Much better chance at having a surge in value than MM. Gronk, Edelman, Marty B, Hogan, Lewis, Amendola...Mitchell doesn't fit in there.

[kwade7575]

Go BPA. To me that is Jordan Howard. Not to mention I think his value will improve this year. So if you feel that he is not fit for your rebuild you can trade him away for an asset that does fit your rebuild

[NY CAT]

Howard