2022 Flag Plant Predictions

[d3sp3rad0]

Here are a few of my own to contribute:

CEH has a revival of sorts and is a top-20 RB on the season.

David Njoku enters the second tier of dynasty TEs (with Hock, Goedert, Waller, etc.)

Kadarius Toney enters the dynasty WR1 (i.e. top-12) conversation by the end of the season

Laviska becomes a used in a Deebo-lite role in JAX and becomes a usable WR3/flex option

Terrace Marshall's dynasty value ends up having a pulse as he becomes juuuust barely involved enough to evoke some interest headed into 2023

[remedy29]

Desmond Ridder wins ROY and is the steel of dynasty rookie drafts.

[joeyk24k]

King Henry will lead the league in yards and be the RB1 proving again that he is just different from every other back . Next year just like the last two every dynasty player will scream sell high and be wrong again.

[esloan35]

Rashod Bateman will show why Hollywood Brown was expendable.

[BabyChark23]

Rashod Bateman will show why Hollywood Brown was expendable.

Where’s the “like” button?

[FantasyFreak]

Rashod Bateman will show why Hollywood Brown was expendable.

Where’s the “like” button?

This doesn't make a ton of sense to me. The Ravens would have been much better off with both on field, unless Duvernay or another WR can make Hollywood look expendable. Brown and Bateman would have been their top 2 WR's, so it's up to the number 3 guy to make Hollywood expendable.

Also, the Ravens moved Hollywood because Hollywood wanted out, the team didn't view him as expendable. Lamar wanted to keep him.

[Jigga94]

Rashod Bateman will show why Hollywood Brown was expendable.

Where’s the “like” button?

This doesn't make a ton of sense to me. The Ravens would have been much better off with both on field, unless Duvernay or another WR can make Hollywood look expendable. Brown and Bateman would have been their top 2 WR's, so it's up to the number 3 guy to make Hollywood expendable.

Also, the Ravens moved Hollywood because Hollywood wanted out, the team didn't view him as expendable. Lamar wanted to keep him.

They weren't going to re-sign Hollywood anyway. Not unless Lamar was going to take a team friendly deal. Yes they were better off with both but it wasn't going to last. So they recouped a 1st. The logic most people have is that the offense really only supported 1 WR so Bateman is stepping up to WR1. If Duvernay fills in WR2 numbers then good for him, but doubtful

[FantasyFreak]

Where’s the “like” button?

This doesn't make a ton of sense to me. The Ravens would have been much better off with both on field, unless Duvernay or another WR can make Hollywood look expendable. Brown and Bateman would have been their top 2 WR's, so it's up to the number 3 guy to make Hollywood expendable.

Also, the Ravens moved Hollywood because Hollywood wanted out, the team didn't view him as expendable. Lamar wanted to keep him.

They weren't going to re-sign Hollywood anyway. Not unless Lamar was going to take a team friendly deal. Yes they were better off with both but it wasn't going to last. So they recouped a 1st. The logic most people have is that the offense really only supported 1 WR so Bateman is stepping up to WR1. If Duvernay fills in WR2 numbers then good for him, but doubtful

Yeah, I guess my point is, for the next 2 years while on his rookie deal, the offense would have been better with Hollywood, unless Duvernay can step up and fill a major role, so Hollywood would not be made obsolete in a football context. Just the attention he would take and the way he can influence a D is better than anything else they have by a wide margin.

Hollywood/Bateman>>>>Bateman/Duvernay by quite a bit, unless Duvernay can step up big time.

[Jigga94]

This doesn't make a ton of sense to me. The Ravens would have been much better off with both on field, unless Duvernay or another WR can make Hollywood look expendable. Brown and Bateman would have been their top 2 WR's, so it's up to the number 3 guy to make Hollywood expendable.

Also, the Ravens moved Hollywood because Hollywood wanted out, the team didn't view him as expendable. Lamar wanted to keep him.

They weren't going to re-sign Hollywood anyway. Not unless Lamar was going to take a team friendly deal. Yes they were better off with both but it wasn't going to last. So they recouped a 1st. The logic most people have is that the offense really only supported 1 WR so Bateman is stepping up to WR1. If Duvernay fills in WR2 numbers then good for him, but doubtful

Yeah, I guess my point is, for the next 2 years while on his rookie deal, the offense would have been better with Hollywood, unless Duvernay can step up and fill a major role, so Hollywood would not be made obsolete in a football context. Just the attention he would take and the way he can influence a D is better than anything else they have by a wide margin.

Hollywood/Bateman>>>>Bateman/Duvernay by quite a bit, unless Duvernay can step up big time.

I fully agree, the passing offense wouldve been better with both + Andrews. Just saying that for fantasy purposes, it looks like it will benefit both Hollywood and Bateman because only the WR1 in BAL really matters. Bateman and Hollywood had some nice games last year but never in the same week. Part of that is inconsistency/injury with Bateman being a rookie obviously, but there was never going to be enough to go around for both WR + Andrews.

[Ice]

Rashod Bateman will show why Hollywood Brown was expendable.

Where’s the “like” button?

Look three to the left of the "Hope" button.

[sugbear65]

C. Kirk puts up top 15 numbers and thrives as T. Lawrence’s number 1 option.

P. Strong proves to be the NE back to own for fantasy by the end of the season and moving foward.

J. Dotson outperforms C. Watson and S. Moore.

R. Tonyan bursts back onto the scene with a top 10 TE finish.

[Plank]

This doesn't make a ton of sense to me. The Ravens would have been much better off with both on field, unless Duvernay or another WR can make Hollywood look expendable. Brown and Bateman would have been their top 2 WR's, so it's up to the number 3 guy to make Hollywood expendable.

Also, the Ravens moved Hollywood because Hollywood wanted out, the team didn't view him as expendable. Lamar wanted to keep him.

They weren't going to re-sign Hollywood anyway. Not unless Lamar was going to take a team friendly deal. Yes they were better off with both but it wasn't going to last. So they recouped a 1st. The logic most people have is that the offense really only supported 1 WR so Bateman is stepping up to WR1. If Duvernay fills in WR2 numbers then good for him, but doubtful

Yeah, I guess my point is, for the next 2 years while on his rookie deal, the offense would have been better with Hollywood, unless Duvernay can step up and fill a major role, so Hollywood would not be made obsolete in a football context. Just the attention he would take and the way he can influence a D is better than anything else they have by a wide margin.

Hollywood/Bateman>>>>Bateman/Duvernay by quite a bit, unless Duvernay can step up big time.

Hits the hope button.

[Jigga94]

They weren't going to re-sign Hollywood anyway. Not unless Lamar was going to take a team friendly deal. Yes they were better off with both but it wasn't going to last. So they recouped a 1st. The logic most people have is that the offense really only supported 1 WR so Bateman is stepping up to WR1. If Duvernay fills in WR2 numbers then good for him, but doubtful

Yeah, I guess my point is, for the next 2 years while on his rookie deal, the offense would have been better with Hollywood, unless Duvernay can step up and fill a major role, so Hollywood would not be made obsolete in a football context. Just the attention he would take and the way he can influence a D is better than anything else they have by a wide margin.

Hollywood/Bateman>>>>Bateman/Duvernay by quite a bit, unless Duvernay can step up big time.

Hits the hope button.

Smashing that button as a Ravens fan

[Two Cents]

Mac Jones steps into the dynasty QB1 tier.

¢¢

[Jrblaha]

MT starts slow and then is a WR1 for the whole second half of the season.