Re: Anthony Richardson is your 1.01 now
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:30 am
If anything this trade makes it very possible that QBs go 1-2-3-4. Arizona is the next domino to fall.
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/viewtopic.php?t=233795
If anything this trade makes it very possible that QBs go 1-2-3-4. Arizona is the next domino to fall.
I could see it either way. They probably want a plan for after Geno.FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:29 pmNobody knows anything. It's misinformation season. . The smoke is either media, or misinformation. Teams don't let people know who they want.
People will start creating narratives, and the Seattle one makes sense to some degree. It's not because the Seattle Front Office is letting anyone know their plans, though.
I just have my doubts Pete Carroll wants a QB that's years away, at his age. He needs to fix that D, I'd be surprised if they went for Richardson over a top end Defender.
As much as getting a plan after geno would be nice, this has gotta be basically best case for a team that did make the playoffs last year and hasn't really lost many pieces, add an elite edge at 5. Get a wr3/lockett replacement in the 20s?Lumps wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 7:51 amI could see it either way. They probably want a plan for after Geno.FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:29 pmNobody knows anything. It's misinformation season. . The smoke is either media, or misinformation. Teams don't let people know who they want.
People will start creating narratives, and the Seattle one makes sense to some degree. It's not because the Seattle Front Office is letting anyone know their plans, though.
I just have my doubts Pete Carroll wants a QB that's years away, at his age. He needs to fix that D, I'd be surprised if they went for Richardson over a top end Defender.
I also could see them talking up the prospect of a C QB to get teams trading up for the QB, QB, QB, QB, oh wow guys we (Seattle) get our pick of best non QB. Thanks!
I would assume since in 1QB, you want the upside, Richardson is QB1. Probably around a late 1st in rookie draftsPullo Vision wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:00 am Are you approaching Richardson differently in 1QB vs SF?
I have the 1.03 on team 4 below and feel the exact same way. Nobody wants to pay up for the 1.03 (offered it straight up for Olave and Wilson to two different GM's, both wanted me to add more) so I am either taking the best QB (Young) or the best QB prospect (Richardson) even though I have Allen and Watson. I have no problem taking Richardson because I can afford the miss given who my two qbs are right now.
Agree with this as well. Young for me in a SF, Richardson in a 1 QB league.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:02 amI would assume since in 1QB, you want the upside, Richardson is QB1. Probably around a late 1st in rookie draftsPullo Vision wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:00 am Are you approaching Richardson differently in 1QB vs SF?
Cool, that's what I'm guessing ends up the consensus.The.Big.Spank wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:05 amAgree with this as well. Young for me in a SF, Richardson in a 1 QB league.Jigga94 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:02 amI would assume since in 1QB, you want the upside, Richardson is QB1. Probably around a late 1st in rookie draftsPullo Vision wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:00 am Are you approaching Richardson differently in 1QB vs SF?