https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/viewtopic.php?t=49716
What do you guys think of Fitz there? Might you have gone with a younger WR?Jules wrote:...except for Tim & Jarrett. They should be in line to dominate this league in 2015.Mullmania wrote:7 RBs taken in the 3rd round so far.
I think people are going a bit more redraft skewed with this draft since it's a one and your'e out setup.
I think that's right. I hedged by saying "trade negotiations/solicitations", but the solicitations are really slowing things down. I've played the waiting game a bit too, but my average draft time is still under 30 minutes. (And I've actually completed a trade.)Jets1Zero wrote:Possibly. I feel there are far less negotiations happening and far more sitting around waiting for someone to want to trade up to your spot going on. I'm guilty of it too, as I wanted to trade down a few spots at the 2.2 Because Julio, Dez, and DThomas were all still on the board, so I told everyone I was going to wait for abit, but I see that happening a lot to very little success.
10 teams have picked since Fitz went off the board. None has taken a WR. That looks like the end of a tier to me.Mullmania wrote:What do you guys think of Fitz there? Might you have gone with a younger WR?Jules wrote:...except for Tim & Jarrett. They should be in line to dominate this league in 2015.Mullmania wrote:7 RBs taken in the 3rd round so far.
I think people are going a bit more redraft skewed with this draft since it's a one and your'e out setup.
If Fitz had fallen just a bit farther, I would have traded up farther than I actually did and taken him. As Jules said, he was the end of a tier, and I think he will rebound big this year. I am not worried about his age, as he's not -that- old.Mullmania wrote:What do you guys think of Fitz there? Might you have gone with a younger WR?
Haha. Not sure how my team is 'lopsided'. I've got a top-3 (in our format) QB, WR, and TE. And so far a top-12 WR to add to that. Seems like some nice depth through three of the four positions.. If I go WR/WR at the 5-6 turn, then it'll be lopsided. We'll see who's available!Jules wrote:Through four rounds (minus one pick from Tim & Jarrett):
Most lopsided teams:
John K. -- Doug Martin; Chris Johnson; D. Murray; M. Ball
Brian D. -- Cam Newton; B. Marshall; Roddy White; Jimmy Graham
I don't hate either of these teams. Will be interesting to see how each one comes together.
My favorite team so far (other than my own):
Dan W. -- Peterson; Forte; Sproles; Jordy
Not happy to be drafting right next to Dan. I predict that he's going to snipe me on several picks.
I agree with Brian. Not sure I see his team as being "lopsided." Other than his lack of RB, his team is very balanced. RB value was just not there when he was OTC. He went with BPA. Just my opinion.DonBrazi wrote:Haha. Not sure how my team is 'lopsided'. I've got a top-3 (in our format) QB, WR, and TE. And so far a top-12 WR to add to that. Seems like some nice depth through three of the four positions.. If I go WR/WR at the 5-6 turn, then it'll be lopsided. We'll see who's available!Jules wrote:Through four rounds (minus one pick from Tim & Jarrett):
Most lopsided teams:
John K. -- Doug Martin; Chris Johnson; D. Murray; M. Ball
Brian D. -- Cam Newton; B. Marshall; Roddy White; Jimmy Graham
I don't hate either of these teams. Will be interesting to see how each one comes together.
My favorite team so far (other than my own):
Dan W. -- Peterson; Forte; Sproles; Jordy
Not happy to be drafting right next to Dan. I predict that he's going to snipe me on several picks.
In the end, it puts the onus on me to be active. I have to basically get on everybody's nerves with my trade offers, and keep an eye on the waiver wire like it's my new born baby. Wish me luck!Zounder wrote:I also like Brian D.'s strategy of going safe. The downside is a complete lack of RBs, but that core is undeniably rock solid.