Again, I think we're in agreement about the state of the team as I mentioned. But at least they are trying to address the crap facilities. Granted, that's window dressing, and doesn't address the culture of the organization.mild wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 5:33 pmI have two little nuggets for you from around the NFL podcasting world from this last week, both courtesy of the Athletic.Shoreline Steamers wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 5:15 pm I am in agreement Mild about the general state of the Chargers. But one weekend watching games I did see a bit about this with regard to the bolded. It's not a game changer, but at least it's a little something?
https://www.chargers.com/practice-facility/
Robert Mays, talking to Chase Daniel - who had a front row seat to a few of these "bad ownership" situations - about the impact that ownership/facilities has, in a neutral choice situation, for where players want to play:
https://youtu.be/YcuCPYMmdFg?si=2FoAMqrhXNCkkuQE&t=2735
(Should be cued around the 44 minute mark. It does not take a leap to guess if the Chargers would fit the criteria of being (one of?) who he's talking about, based on what we know of that Players Report Cards for their organisations and the Chargers scores on that)
Second: the interview posted today with Diana Russini, where they outright talk about this exact situation - which job is better out of the Falcons vs. the Chargers for a prospective Head Coach. Money quote: "I had a conversation with a potential candidate for that (Chargers HC) ... and... he wants to avoid it." (that situation)
https://theathletic.com/podcast/211-the ... pisode=901
Timestamp of 10 minutes or so.
Frankly, I would be a little concerned if I were rostering Herbert and hoping that he reaches his potential. He might have been better off playing out his rookie contract and then entering free-agency. Of course the risk of injury is likely always top of mind. At least he's getting paid I guess.