Dynasty League Football Forum

wickerkat1212 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 11:45 am They are taking Williams. 99% sure. I have the 1.01 in a 1 QB league and I'm taking Harrison. Made sure I'm getting at least one share. I also have the 1.02 in a Superflex, and honestly, I'm good with either player there. If 1.01 takes Harrison, it'll be fun to have a share of Williams in Chicago. If he takes Williams, then I'll have two shares of Harrison. All works.

Chicago has done a good job of setting Williams up to succeed.

At 9, most likely all three WRs are gone. But Odunze could fall, and if he does, I hope they take him. If all three are gone, I'd look to either LT or DE. Alt/Fashanu or Verse are what I'm thinking. I really do NOT want them to trade down. TAKE BLUE CHIP.

TheTroll wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 11:48 am

wickerkat1212 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 11:45 am They are taking Williams. 99% sure. I have the 1.01 in a 1 QB league and I'm taking Harrison. Made sure I'm getting at least one share. I also have the 1.02 in a Superflex, and honestly, I'm good with either player there. If 1.01 takes Harrison, it'll be fun to have a share of Williams in Chicago. If he takes Williams, then I'll have two shares of Harrison. All works.

Chicago has done a good job of setting Williams up to succeed.

At 9, most likely all three WRs are gone. But Odunze could fall, and if he does, I hope they take him. If all three are gone, I'd look to either LT or DE. Alt/Fashanu or Verse are what I'm thinking. I really do NOT want them to trade down. TAKE BLUE CHIP.

I have to commend you for that Avatar but when can we replace it? It is really not easy on the eyes.

Shcritters wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 4:02 pm 100% Chicago is taking Willaims now that Fields has been traded.

TheTroll wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:31 am

BabyChark23 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:17 am I think it’s likely they address a different position at 9 at this point. I wouldn’t fault them for taking Rome. It just seems like they could bolster the line or add to elite help to defense with that pick now that they have WR locked down.

Very true. 1.09 is a luxury pick at this point. Could even trade back too.

mild wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 8:05 pm

TheTroll wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:31 am

BabyChark23 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:17 am I think it’s likely they address a different position at 9 at this point. I wouldn’t fault them for taking Rome. It just seems like they could bolster the line or add to elite help to defense with that pick now that they have WR locked down.

Very true. 1.09 is a luxury pick at this point. Could even trade back too.

Trading back is very likely, even if Wicker won't like it.

Apart from 1.01 and 1.09, the only other picks they have in this draft are a 3rd and a 4th.

They simply have too many holes still to only bring in 4 players. I would expect at least a small trade back at 9.

mild wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 8:05 pm

TheTroll wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:31 am

BabyChark23 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:17 am I think it’s likely they address a different position at 9 at this point. I wouldn’t fault them for taking Rome. It just seems like they could bolster the line or add to elite help to defense with that pick now that they have WR locked down.

Very true. 1.09 is a luxury pick at this point. Could even trade back too.

Trading back is very likely, even if Wicker won't like it.

Apart from 1.01 and 1.09, the only other picks they have in this draft are a 3rd and a 4th.

They simply have too many holes still to only bring in 4 players. I would expect at least a small trade back at 9.

Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:45 am

mild wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 8:05 pm

TheTroll wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:31 am

Very true. 1.09 is a luxury pick at this point. Could even trade back too.

Trading back is very likely, even if Wicker won't like it.

Apart from 1.01 and 1.09, the only other picks they have in this draft are a 3rd and a 4th.

They simply have too many holes still to only bring in 4 players. I would expect at least a small trade back at 9.

Granted, maybe there's something I'm missing about the Bears, but I have no idea why their fans still want to draft another WR at 9 after the Allen trade.

Sure, BPA when you're picking that high is logical, but you still want someone who can make an immediate impact when you draft that high. Odunze is not doing anything behind Moore and Allen going forward. Plus, there's already rumors about them extending Allen, which likely helped get the deal done to begin with.

Surely there are other holes on the team that can put a rookie in immediate position for positive contributions. There will be other WRs in other drafts.

Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:45 am

mild wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 8:05 pm

TheTroll wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:31 am

Very true. 1.09 is a luxury pick at this point. Could even trade back too.

Trading back is very likely, even if Wicker won't like it.

Apart from 1.01 and 1.09, the only other picks they have in this draft are a 3rd and a 4th.

They simply have too many holes still to only bring in 4 players. I would expect at least a small trade back at 9.

Granted, maybe there's something I'm missing about the Bears, but I have no idea why their fans still want to draft another WR at 9 after the Allen trade.

Sure, BPA when you're picking that high is logical, but you still want someone who can make an immediate impact when you draft that high. Odunze is not doing anything behind Moore and Allen going forward. Plus, there's already rumors about them extending Allen, which likely helped get the deal done to begin with.

Surely there are other holes on the team that can put a rookie in immediate position for positive contributions. There will be other WRs in other drafts.

wickerkat1212 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 1:43 pm

Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:45 am

mild wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 8:05 pm

Trading back is very likely, even if Wicker won't like it.

Apart from 1.01 and 1.09, the only other picks they have in this draft are a 3rd and a 4th.

They simply have too many holes still to only bring in 4 players. I would expect at least a small trade back at 9.

Granted, maybe there's something I'm missing about the Bears, but I have no idea why their fans still want to draft another WR at 9 after the Allen trade.

Sure, BPA when you're picking that high is logical, but you still want someone who can make an immediate impact when you draft that high. Odunze is not doing anything behind Moore and Allen going forward. Plus, there's already rumors about them extending Allen, which likely helped get the deal done to begin with.

Surely there are other holes on the team that can put a rookie in immediate position for positive contributions. There will be other WRs in other drafts.

Allen isn't getting any younger. And we have no depth after DJM/Allen. I'd love Odunze at 1.09. So, after the top three WR, I think they look at Blue Chip LT (Alt/Oshanu) or DE (Turner/Verse). If those are ALL gone, trade down.

frerichs5 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 2:11 pm

wickerkat1212 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 1:43 pm

Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:45 am

Granted, maybe there's something I'm missing about the Bears, but I have no idea why their fans still want to draft another WR at 9 after the Allen trade.

Sure, BPA when you're picking that high is logical, but you still want someone who can make an immediate impact when you draft that high. Odunze is not doing anything behind Moore and Allen going forward. Plus, there's already rumors about them extending Allen, which likely helped get the deal done to begin with.

Surely there are other holes on the team that can put a rookie in immediate position for positive contributions. There will be other WRs in other drafts.

Allen isn't getting any younger. And we have no depth after DJM/Allen. I'd love Odunze at 1.09. So, after the top three WR, I think they look at Blue Chip LT (Alt/Oshanu) or DE (Turner/Verse). If those are ALL gone, trade down.

Unless you believe only 1 QB is getting drafted early, it’s impossible for all those guys to be gone by 1.09. You’re making a good case for a trade down makes sense…when any of those guys help you and you only have 4 draft picks. Trade down, get more picks, possibly still get one of those guys.

And that’s still ignoring Fuaga and Bowers.

wickerkat1212 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:00 pm Who do you like better—Adonai Mitchell or Ladd McConkey?

yinzername wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:09 pm

wickerkat1212 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:00 pm Who do you like better—Adonai Mitchell or Ladd McConkey?

Lately leaning Ladd