JaMarr Chase

[Djg1996]

I'm not sure people here accurately assessed the value in a 20 team league. I would much prefer rolling out Hurts and Nabors every week than Stafford (with age and injury concerns) and Chase. Think this one ages poorly...

So the value is now Hurts over Chase? Nabers hasn’t caught a pass yet. With Daniels it may not be all roses. If this trade happens 14 months ago, what would you say then? Stafford is temporary. I’ve got assets to upgrade. It’s not a SF. There’s no way you can pass on Chase for Hurts and the 1.2, regardless of who that ends up being.

[Menace2010]

I'm not sure people here accurately assessed the value in a 20 team league. I would much prefer rolling out Hurts and Nabors every week than Stafford (with age and injury concerns) and Chase. Think this one ages poorly...

So the value is now Hurts over Chase? Nabers hasn’t caught a pass yet. With Daniels it may not be all roses. If this trade happens 14 months ago, what would you say then? Stafford is temporary. I’ve got assets to upgrade. It’s not a SF. There’s no way you can pass on Chase for Hurts and the 1.2, regardless of who that ends up being.

Never said I'd take Hurts over Chase. But in a 20 team league I can confidently say the value is closer. If you're using Superflex as the metric, it a 12 team Superflex I'd value Hurts over Chase. 10 team sure, Chase over Hurts by a descent margin, but I'm not convinced 1.2 is that margin.

And I'm notoriously lower on rookies than consensus because I've had success moving later 1sts for high-end WRs in nearly every league I play. Even with that, I think:

Chase > Hurts, hell even >>
But 1.2 is >>>> Stafford.

This is my dilemma. We'll see.