Bills take WR at 10

[BuckeyeNation]

I am very nervous owning the 1.4 with Mike Williams landing here, CD i feel differently. This is a run first team and i dont think they can support two WR's. Sammy Watkins is very injury prone, true. But if he is on the field, MW and him cant both be dominant. I think this spot would make him slide.

I wouldn't like Williams in BUF, but it wouldn't make me that nervous at 1.04, or any top 6 pick really. If you're at 4 and hate Williams in BUF then you have other options and could go Mixon/McCaffrey. If you're sitting at 1.05-1.06 and Williams falls because of this, then I think he's a great value at that spot even if BUF drafts him. I definitely would consider dropping Williams below 4 if the Bills drafted him, but I haven't been quite as high on him as others have throughout this whole process.

[clarion contrarion]

this ^^ pretty much , not sure tyrod will be the qb and not sure buffalo knows how to use the wr they have already . The new regime may change all that but they have other needs besides wr and drafting williams that high would be silly IMHO. I have not seen him linked there by anyone that I remember but OJ Howard would make more sense to buffalo at 10 than a wr .

[TB3falcons]

I read a blurb on rotoworld that Sean McDermott didn't want Tyrod Taylor and that Doug Whaley made the decision. Whaley is supposedly on his way out, and McDermott really likes Watson at 10.

Thought it was the exact opposite, Whaley didn't want Tyrod and McDermott did due to his BAL ties.

[James McGhee]

I read a blurb on rotoworld that Sean McDermott didn't want Tyrod Taylor and that Doug Whaley made the decision. Whaley is supposedly on his way out, and McDermott really likes Watson at 10.

If the Bills take Watson at 10 they continue to be a joke of an organization.

[Dynasty DeLorean]

In a vacuum, landing spot shouldn't really negatively impact a rookie WR. You shouldn't be counting on them to be producing for you until year 2 or 3 anyway, in which case the bad situation has likely improved. However, I think bumping up a WR that goes to a prolific offense could be prudent, such as Michael Thomas to the Saints. So in theory, if you had 2 WR's super close, sure bump up the one that goes to the better offense. But in itself, I wouldn't really think less of a WR just b/c of what team drafts them.