The Tyreek Hill Thread

[ArrylT]

TheNuts,

You are under no pressure or compulsion to stop posting in this thread.

[FantasyFreak]

TheNuts,

You are under no pressure or compulsion to stop posting in this thread.

FYI, I wasn't suggesting or asking that. Just a request not to respond to my comments, as I feel it would be more productive at this point. Moving on.

[ArrylT]

TheNuts,

You are under no pressure or compulsion to stop posting in this thread.

FYI, I wasn't suggesting or asking that. Just a request not to respond to my comments, as I feel it would be more productive at this point. Moving on.

Absolutely. However since it was a public thread, I simply wanted to make sure that got clarified, and that abiding by your request should in no way interfere with his ability to discuss the topic.

[fakespike13]

Tyreek Hill- league winner. Cheers to everyone who held strong and who bought him on the cheap.

[Cowboysfan33]

Tyreek Hill- league winner. Cheers to everyone who held strong and who bought him on the cheap.

Eww.

[TheNuts]

Good for you. There is so much wrong with this, IMO. FYI, I'm blocking you so I don't have to read what you have to say anymore. If we were in person my words would be a bit different, but I won't do it over a public internet forum. Please do me a favour and don't respond to my posts. Thanks.

This doesn't sound very constructive. It's ok for someone to have him on their fantasy team, but they can't actually say that he helps their team? People are too sensitive. Nothing in the fantasy football world will affect how Hill acts, doesn't act, how the NFL decides to deal with him, or his contract with a team. So if someone owns Hill in fantasy football, and I guarantee he will not be just sitting on waivers in your league, they have to act like he is begrudingly on their team?

Hill was undervalued as hell last year, which lead me to a championship in my big money league, and a second place finish in my dynasty league. Now I have him in both dynasties, and I will probably end up with him in my big money league again at a discount. I have said from the jump that he should be punished/suspended. I don't think any more fist wringing needs to be done at this point. While people are being sensitive about the situation though, I will be capitalizing.

I would ask that you refrain from being internet tough guy. It's a bad vibe to send through a place like this.

I don't think you understand. I don't respect your opinion and the way you come across, so I'm choosing to block you. Please stop responding to my posts, it isn't difficult. Thanks.

I was all over Mahomes and Hill last year, so you may want to make sure you check in to see what I am saying.

I think it's odd that you specifically point out not respecting my opinion, when the people who assumed Hill guilty of breaking his sons arm should probably have their opinions questioned. I am here to give and get good advice for fantasy football. I'm not here to take a moral stand or hop up onto a moral soap box, and I am not in the business of losing. It's my advice you buy Hill while he is still kind of cheap, so that your fantasy team is better.

[FiremanEd]

There is still risk with Tyreek, but I feel comfortable saying that those who rush sold previously are experiencing fantasy football remorse. Some will say they have morals and don’t regret it, but when focusing on fantasy football, it was a very poor decision. I was on the brink a few times but am very happy I held. Have not successfully bought shares though and will wait to hedge cross league impacts given the escalating price. It very well could be league winning investment though.

Feeling it necessary to tell someone they are being blocked, and then multiple times not to respond to them, primarily due to difference of opinion, and then claiming it be for the best of the discussion, feels comical. If you want to be the bigger person then just don’t respond. No need to egg someone on. The sensitivity in here as if it is some moral playground is far too much.

That said, I appreciate the perspectives shared in this thread. They are are valid IMO if you take them with unbiased eyes, and all have varying degrees of legitimacy in terms of what the outcome could be. The market has varying opinions, and whether ‘news’ is legitimate news or just fluff pieces, it all impacts market perception. There likely will be more high/low value swings upcoming. Will be interesting to follow. Lots of debate still to come when the suspension comes down.

[FantasyFreak]

There is still risk with Tyreek, but I feel comfortable saying that those who rush sold previously are experiencing fantasy football remorse. Some will say they have morals and don’t regret it, but when focusing on fantasy football, it was a very poor decision. I was on the brink a few times but am very happy I held. Have not successfully bought shares though and will wait to hedge cross league impacts given the escalating price. It very well could be league winning investment though.

Feeling it necessary to tell someone they are being blocked, and then multiple times not to respond to them, primarily due to difference of opinion, and then claiming it be for the best of the discussion, feels comical. If you want to be the bigger person then just don’t respond. No need to egg someone on. The sensitivity in here as if it is some moral playground is far too much.

That said, I appreciate the perspectives shared in this thread. They are are valid IMO if you take them with unbiased eyes, and all have varying degrees of legitimacy in terms of what the outcome could be. The market has varying opinions, and whether ‘news’ is legitimate news or just fluff pieces, it all impacts market perception. There likely will be more high/low value swings upcoming. Will be interesting to follow. Lots of debate still to come when the suspension comes down.

Well, I actually responded only once after I said that, and it was within the same minute, as I was again requesting they not bother responding to my posts, since my initial request was not given. He's free to do what he wants, but all I did was again ask him to not bother responding to my posts, as I won't be seeing them to respond or defend my position. Was not trying to egg anyone on. I'm going to stay out of this thread until there is some actual development to the situation. Thanks. Have a great day.

[Jigga94]

Tyreek Hill- league winner. Cheers to everyone who held strong and who bought him on the cheap.

Cheers mate

[ArrylT]

There is still risk with Tyreek, but I feel comfortable saying that those who rush sold previously are experiencing fantasy football remorse. Some will say they have morals and don’t regret it, but when focusing on fantasy football, it was a very poor decision. I was on the brink a few times but am very happy I held. Have not successfully bought shares though and will wait to hedge cross league impacts given the escalating price. It very well could be league winning investment though.

I believe that will depend on the owner. I feel that the #1 priority when it comes to a hobby, whether or not you win prizes, should be the enjoyment of said hobby. So regardless of the cost of selling, if an owner feels having a player on that roster hinders or interferes with their enjoyment, I think that that cost is justified. Some things can act as a trigger, so even the ownership of a player might trigger an emotional response that is best avoided.

I can honestly state that there are players that I would rather not own even if it meant knowingly losing that season. Some things can have too high a price to pay.

[TheNuts]

There is still risk with Tyreek, but I feel comfortable saying that those who rush sold previously are experiencing fantasy football remorse. Some will say they have morals and don’t regret it, but when focusing on fantasy football, it was a very poor decision. I was on the brink a few times but am very happy I held. Have not successfully bought shares though and will wait to hedge cross league impacts given the escalating price. It very well could be league winning investment though.

I believe that will depend on the owner. I feel that the #1 priority when it comes to a hobby, whether or not you win prizes, should be the enjoyment of said hobby. So regardless of the cost of selling, if an owner feels having a player on that roster hinders or interferes with their enjoyment, I think that that cost is justified. Some things can act as a trigger, so even the ownership of a player might trigger an emotional response that is best avoided.

I can honestly state that there are players that I would rather not own even if it meant knowingly losing that season. Some things can have too high a price to pay.

It's fine if someone doesn't want him on their team. I just don't get why people expect me to also have him off of my roster. They should probably join a league where certain players aren't allowed for moral conduct issues.

[Cameron Giles]

Tyreek Hill- league winner. Cheers to everyone who held strong and who bought him on the cheap.

[usps33]

Looking like a 1 to 2 games suspension is the worse outcome now. Hill has already been in meetings with the NFL according to unnamed sources on Twitter, but it seems believable, but still speculation. For any Hill owners, I suggest you don’t sell him at a discount from here on out.

[TheNuts]

Looking like a 1 to 2 games suspension is the worse outcome now. Hill has already been in meetings with the NFL according to unnamed sources on Twitter, but it seems believable, but still speculation. For any Hill owners, I suggest you don’t sell him at a discount from here on out.

Great news for his fantasy owners

[Cult of Dionysus]

Especially those of us who bought him for a 2020 3rd.

Lol