To further illustrate this in pictorial form, for the visually inclined...mild wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 2:00 pm To the quoted, if there's one thing you're missing here... it's the depth. The Top 5 is just the start of it.
RB's 6 through 10-12ish are insanely good this year. Really interesting guys that will be available at a discount relative to what they would probably cost in a normal year, sheerly by positional scarcity (or lack thereof).
Heh, yeah, we’re getting close to due on another great rookie rb class. I think the last ones were 2017 and then 2008 if I’m not mistaken.mild wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 2:14 pmTo further illustrate this in pictorial form, for the visually inclined...mild wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 2:00 pm To the quoted, if there's one thing you're missing here... it's the depth. The Top 5 is just the start of it.
RB's 6 through 10-12ish are insanely good this year. Really interesting guys that will be available at a discount relative to what they would probably cost in a normal year, sheerly by positional scarcity (or lack thereof).
It's a really fun class.Dynasty DeLorean wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 2:31 pm Heh, yeah, we’re getting close to due on another great rookie rb class. I think the last ones were 2017 and then 2008 if I’m not mistaken.
The comp is Mike Davis.
Right, his footwork stood out to me, he moves fluidly, and has great vision. Those skills usually translate to the next level well.
I think that his lack of top end speed is compensated by having above average hands. I see him as a Mark Ingram type player. I think him being white is holding him back. I’ll let other peoples stereotypes help put him on the majority of my teams. He’s going in a range that’s very obtainablemild wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 3:52 am Personally, there are other players I'm far more interested in this class than Skattebo. If it's a choice between them and him in that range, I won't be getting many shares. We'll have to see what happens in my drafts.
I view him as that classic Mike Davis sort of power back. There's no doubt he could see work and thrive. He's never going to be the sort of big play threat that would see him take over a backfield completely, though. (imo)
By the numbers, this is probably our best shot yet at this.Dynasty DeLorean wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 2:31 pm Heh, yeah, we’re getting close to due on another great rookie rb class. I think the last ones were 2017 and then 2008 if I’m not mistaken.
https://x.com/RayGQue/status/1891196508873126390I still don't think we are giving this 2025 RB class the proper credit it deserves. Looking legit 20 deep, you can make a case for any of them depending on their landing spot.
20 deep until they start running 4.7's at the combine, lol. But yeah, hopefully it's legit, because i punted RB on both startups i did last year.mild wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 12:50 pmBy the numbers, this is probably our best shot yet at this.Dynasty DeLorean wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 2:31 pm Heh, yeah, we’re getting close to due on another great rookie rb class. I think the last ones were 2017 and then 2008 if I’m not mistaken.
via RayGQue:
https://x.com/RayGQue/status/1891196508873126390I still don't think we are giving this 2025 RB class the proper credit it deserves. Looking legit 20 deep, you can make a case for any of them depending on their landing spot.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
