Michael Pittman + 2.05 for the 1.06

[Horn1]

What about my Michael Pittman + my 2.05 for his 1.06?

My team is in the sig below. I don't view Pittman as a make or break piece on my team. He's talented player, yes, but I'm not in love with him with Anthony Richardson as his QB.

I already own the 1.05 & this would allow me to grab 2 of:

Jonathan Brooks
Brock Bowers
Xavier Worthy
BTJ Jr
Trey Benson

[Black Adam]

You're clearly set on getting rid of Pittman so pay up for the 1.06 so you can stop making these threads / Smash accept.

[NathanielWegman]

I would hold Pittman and draft Bowers at 1.5

[Horn1]

You're clearly set on getting rid of Pittman so pay up for the 1.06 so you can stop making these threads / Smash accept.

Come on man, don't be like that.

My team is middle of the road, esp. now that Harbaugh is at the Chargers (affects Herbert). Is Pittman really going to lead me to fantasy glory?

The 2.05 is a dart throw rookie pick.

Running backs can fall off the face of the earth at any moment.

Having the 1.05 & 1.06 allows me to.continue to grab more talent & grab another younger RB.

Appreciate any input you can give

[blueeyedbanditt]

I think the value is on the Pittman side.

[Funr1de]

Odunze/Bowers/McCarthy + Peirsoll or Pitman?

I think you hope one of those guys is = to pitman. If TE premium….. bowers might fit the bill. If not, I keep pitman and trade for a proven player mid season.

[kellysheroes]

thats too cheap for Pitt; after the 1st 3 Top WRs I would much rather Pitt... hell I might even take Pitt over Rome

[Horn1]

thats too cheap for Pitt; after the 1st 3 Top WRs I would much rather Pitt... hell I might even take Pitt over Rome

Correct, but look at my team. Is Pittman going to make or break my WR room or starting lineup?

There are 4 WR's on my roster that can easily dupilicate Pittman's per-weekly production.

This trade is about diversifing talent while also trying to hit on another young RB.

[The.Big.Spank]

thats too cheap for Pitt; after the 1st 3 Top WRs I would much rather Pitt... hell I might even take Pitt over Rome

Correct, but look at my team. Is Pittman going to make or break my WR room or starting lineup?

There are 4 WR's on my roster that can easily dupilicate Pittman's per-weekly production.

This trade is about diversifing talent while also trying to hit on another young RB.

Just because you have more talented receivers on your team does not mean you should lose value on trading one away to get something else. Why not trade Pittman for a running back you know will produce?

[Horn1]

thats too cheap for Pitt; after the 1st 3 Top WRs I would much rather Pitt... hell I might even take Pitt over Rome

Correct, but look at my team. Is Pittman going to make or break my WR room or starting lineup?

There are 4 WR's on my roster that can easily dupilicate Pittman's per-weekly production.

This trade is about diversifing talent while also trying to hit on another young RB.

Just because you have more talented receivers on your team does not mean you should lose value on trading one away to get something else.

Yes, but not every trade is going to be apples for apples either. Roster management, future projections, & rolling the dice is also a part of the game.

The 2.05 is a semi throw away dart throw pick in most rookie drafts.

Do I have guys on my roster that can duplicate Pittman's production? Yes.

I'd rather use Pittman to pay to move up from the 2.05 to 1.06.

[Black Adam]

You're clearly set on getting rid of Pittman so pay up for the 1.06 so you can stop making these threads / Smash accept.

Come on man, don't be like that.

My team is middle of the road, esp. now that Harbaugh is at the Chargers (affects Herbert). Is Pittman really going to lead me to fantasy glory?

The 2.05 is a dart throw rookie pick.

Running backs can fall off the face of the earth at any moment.

Having the 1.05 & 1.06 allows me to.continue to grab more talent & grab another younger RB.

Appreciate any input you can give

Your team is middle-of-the-road because of poor management (that is to say: you).

I differ from consensus on a lot of things on this board, but I'm at least producing results. Are you? If so, keep doing what you're doing. If not, maybe think about switching it up.


Either way, I'm not gonna waste my time. Best of luck in all your future endeavors.

[blemly]

Correct, but look at my team. Is Pittman going to make or break my WR room or starting lineup?

There are 4 WR's on my roster that can easily dupilicate Pittman's per-weekly production.

This trade is about diversifing talent while also trying to hit on another young RB.

Just because you have more talented receivers on your team does not mean you should lose value on trading one away to get something else.

Yes, but not every trade is going to be apples for apples either. Roster management, future projections, & rolling the dice is also a part of the game.

The 2.05 is a semi throw away dart throw pick in most rookie drafts.

Do I have guys on my roster that can duplicate Pittman's production? Yes.

I'd rather use Pittman to pay to move up from the 2.05 to 1.06.

I was prepared to agree with you that BlackAdam’s first comment was not that instructive, but the purpose of your post appears to get people to agree with you that you should trade Pittman + 2.05 for 1.06, not whether you should move him.

In SF, sure, but this is not a good value deal in 1QB. As others have said just move Pittman for another RB if you really want to move him.

[Horn1]

You're clearly set on getting rid of Pittman so pay up for the 1.06 so you can stop making these threads / Smash accept.

Come on man, don't be like that.

My team is middle of the road, esp. now that Harbaugh is at the Chargers (affects Herbert). Is Pittman really going to lead me to fantasy glory?

The 2.05 is a dart throw rookie pick.

Running backs can fall off the face of the earth at any moment.

Having the 1.05 & 1.06 allows me to.continue to grab more talent & grab another younger RB.

Appreciate any input you can give

Your team is middle-of-the-road because of poor management (that is to say: you).

I differ from consensus on a lot of things on this board, but I'm at least producing results. Are you? If so, keep doing what you're doing. If not, maybe think about switching it up.


Either way, I'm not gonna waste my time. Best of luck in all your future endeavors.

Dude.. the league is 4 years old.

I won the league in year 1

2nd in year 2

Got 7th year 3 but still was 3rd highest scoring team but ran into bad luck match ups week after week. Traded away Tom Brady midway in the season & landed the dude's 1st round pick which turned out to be the 1.01...Bijan.

Got 8th last year, still was 4th in overall scoring. (Tanked the last 2 weeks).

IDP also plays a big part into the league as well.

[killer_of_giants]

IDP also plays a big part into the league as well.

starting only 4, i somehow doubt it.

Do I have guys on my roster that can duplicate Pittman's production? Yes.

could.
there's a difference.
i think pittman is a starter for that team.
if you don't like him and/or think diontae, ridley and pickens will be on his level or thereabouts (you clearly do...) then sell him, and if you think that deal is fair, go for it. most on here disagree, make of that what you will.