Officially OTC @ 2.05

This is the place for team advice - should I make this trade, should I draft that player, etc.
noen10
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 6:33 am
Location: indiana

Officially OTC @ 2.05

Postby noen10 » Wed May 15, 2024 4:38 am

ImageTraded tank dell for 2.3 and Mike Williams to get bowers.

Now this is who is available.

AD Mitchell
Bo Nix
Corum
Leaggette
Pearsall
Penix
Roman Wilson
Polk

Who would you all take. I’m still leaning Corum to replace Kyren who I traded away earlier. Thoughts?
Thanks,
Nick

Team 1:
10 Team PPR, 1 QB, 1 Superflex, 2RBs, 3 WRs, 2 Flex, 1 TE
2020 finish: 10-6 3rd place
2021 Finished: 2nd place 8-6
2022 finished 5th 9-5
2023 finished 1st 9-5


QB: J.Allen, TLaw, K.Murray
RB: J.Taylor, KWIII, D.Henry, Akers, Jav.Williams, ZWhite, Corum
WR: CD lamb, Nabers , D.London, Puka, D.Johnson, Keenan Allen, J.Williams, Josh Downs, Tank, KShakir, QJohnston, MWilson, DDouglas, X.Gipson, Legette
TE: Hock, Mayer, Bowers


Picks:
2025:1, 3
2026: 1, 3


Team 2:
10 Team PPR, START: 2 QB, 1 Superflex (3 possible QBs), 2RBs, 3 WRs, 2 Flex, 1 TE
2023 finished 3rd 7-7

QB: Burrow, Richardson, Minshew, Stafford, McCarthy, Trask
RB: Najee, Benson, DCook, Mostert, Moss, KHerbert, KWilliams, Tsermon, wright
WR: JChase, DK, CKirk, CWatson, BTJ, XGipson, KBourne, claypool, Chark, NBrown, CAustin, TTucker, APierce, RShaheed, Ma.Mims, McConkey
TE: TJ Hock, Mayer, hurst, fant


Picks:
2024: 2.6, 3.6
2025: 1, 2, 3

User avatar
The.Big.Spank
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5856
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:27 am

Re: Officially OTC @ 2.05

Postby The.Big.Spank » Wed May 15, 2024 5:03 am

In a SF, Nix. In a non SF, Legette. He is a boom/bust swing for the fences pick which is perfect for right there in a rookie draft.
Team 1: 16 Team
QB's: Fields, Wentz,
RB: D. Harris, D. Montgomery, Kendre M.
WR: Chase, AJ Brown, Aiyuk, Bateman
TE: Waller, J. Woods, Dulich, Mayer

Team 2: 12 Team SF 1ppr, Start 10
QB: Mahomes, Burrow, Watson
RB: Hall, Walker, Javonte, Pacheco, K Mitchell, Dobbins
WR: Godwin, JSN, Pittman, Pickens, Toney, DP Jones, S Moore
TE: Andrews, Fant, Likely
(2024) 1.03, 2.03, 3.03
(2025) Top 3 1st, my 1st

Team 3 SF, TEP, Start 11 ppr
QB: AR, Watson, Young, Levis
RB: ETN, Walker, Pierce, Akers, Pacheco, Herbert, Warren, Kelley
WR: G. Wilson, Higgins, Godwin, Kirk, Bateman, Collins, Doubs, Chark, Shaheed,
TE: Schultz, I Smith, Bellinger, Parham, Fant, Likely, Granson,

blueeyedbanditt
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 221
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 5:38 am

Re: Officially OTC @ 2.05

Postby blueeyedbanditt » Wed May 15, 2024 5:07 am

I know you're set at QB but I'd still be tempted to take Nix here in SF. It's too early for Corum for me, but I still believe Kyren is going to be the workhorse in that backfield. If Corum is your guy, is there any way to move back?
10 Team, PPR, 27 roster: 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 FLEX, 1 DST, 1 K
QB: Patrick Mahomes, Jordan Love
RB: Jonathan Taylor, Kyren Williams, Devon Achane, Derrick Henry, Jaylen Warren
WR: CeeDee Lamb, DJ Moore, DK Metcalf, Drake London, Tee Higgins, Marquise Brown
TE: George Kittle, Pat Freiermuth

Picks:
2024: 1.05, 2.10, 4th, 5th
2025: 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th
2026: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th

CGW
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6770
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 2:31 pm

Re: Officially OTC @ 2.05

Postby CGW » Wed May 15, 2024 8:28 am

Is this for the teams in signature? (10 teamer) If so, I wouldnt worry too much about Nix (or even Penix who id prefer over him by a wide margin).

AD Mitchell and Legette would be my vote. Only way I'd take Corum is if I owned Kyren and wanted to handcuff.
Last edited by CGW on Wed May 15, 2024 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

doctor d
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 300
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 1:31 pm

Re: Officially OTC @ 2.05

Postby doctor d » Wed May 15, 2024 9:55 am

I'd take whichever of the QBs you like more. With your QB room, I might lean Penix since you can afford to sit on him and I think he has more upside than Nix. I'd rather take a potential difference-maker who has a good shot to rise in value over what basically would be a depth WR for you.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Mtt33 and 3 guests