Move from 1.03 to 1.02? (Poll)

[Hankybro21]

Team 3. 10tm SF.

Give: 1.03 + Pick 13 + Pick 14
Get: 1.02

If I made this trade then I'd take MHJ 1.02. If not, then I'd take Nabers 1.03, most likely, and then BPAs at 13 and 14.

The only caveat here is that I am pretty sure that 1.02 will take Daniels if he stays put, but I am not certain, so I may get MHJ anyway. Should I trade up to 2 so I can lock in MHJ? Or just hold it, take the risk, and settle on Nabers + 13 and 14 if 1.02 takes MHJ. I have no picks in 2025 and a 2026 1

[Mtt33]

What are the starting positions? I’m sitting tight unless it’s really shallow… even then I’m probably sitting tight but it’s closer.

[Hankybro21]

What are the starting positions? I’m sitting tight unless it’s really shallow… even then I’m probably sitting tight but it’s closer.

Start 10: Q1 R2 W2 T1 SF1 F3

[moishetreats]

I'm definitely keeping the three picks. Even if MJH were a lock at 1.02.

With no future picks, those extra two are key. Given your roster and its depth, I'd actually explore using those picks to trade for some in '25 and '26, restocking your future assets, giving you capital to trade in-season, and opening up some much-needed roster spots. I don't think giving up all that for the increased possibility of getting MJH is even close to worth it.

[henry1jg]

Team 3. 10tm SF.

Give: 1.03 + Pick 13 + Pick 14
Get: 1.02

If I made this trade then I'd take MHJ 1.02. If not, then I'd take Nabers 1.03, most likely, and then BPAs at 13 and 14.

The only caveat here is that I am pretty sure that 1.02 will take Daniels if he stays put, but I am not certain, so I may get MHJ anyway. Should I trade up to 2 so I can lock in MHJ? Or just hold it, take the risk, and settle on Nabers + 13 and 14 if 1.02 takes MHJ. I have no picks in 2025 and a 2026 1

The gap between MHJ and Nabers isn't big enough for me to give two legitimate assets in SF

[TheTroll]

Nabers side easy

[abloom]

Nabers very easily in a ten team SF

[tstafford]

I'd consider it if you could drop the #13 or #14.

I understand that a lot of folks see Nabers and MHJR as very close and I tend to agree. However what is absolutely clear is that MHJR is in a superior situation for '24. MHJR is a top-12 WR for redraft whereas Nabers is closer to #36 for me. I understand that we're playing dynasty, but MHJR putting up great '24 numbers will help you win games and increase his value. It's worth paying something to tier up to MHJR.

[Hankybro21]

I'd consider it if you could drop the #13 or #14.

I understand that a lot of folks see Nabers and MHJR as very close and I tend to agree. However what is absolutely clear is that MHJR is in a superior situation for '24. MHJR is a top-12 WR for redraft whereas Nabers is closer to #36 for me. I understand that we're playing dynasty, but MHJR putting up great '24 numbers will help you win games and increase his value. It's worth paying something to tier up to MHJR.

So 3 and 13 for 2 would be a move you'd consider making here?

[NathanielWegman]

I’d give up one of the 2 additional picks but not both to secure MHJ

[Dynasty DeLorean]

Nabers side easy

Yeah not even close. I think people are spellbound by the name and not understanding Nabers is basically the same as MHJ

[Hankybro21]

Nabers side easy

Yeah not even close. I think people are spellbound by the name and not understanding Nabers is basically the same as MHJ

I mean…I’m a colts fan so that probably fits