Make one, two of these trades? Or hold?

[Randomguess]

12 team, PPR, start 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 non QB flex.
Not TEP
My current team and picks
QB: Lawrence, Minshew
RB: Bijan, Etienne, R White, Z White, Spears
WR: Lamb, Nacua, D Smith, Shakir
TE: Laporta, Freiermuth
Picks: 1.01, 1.02, 1.04, 1.05, 1.10, 4.01, two 2025 1sts
I will draft MHJ and Nabers no matter what and won't trade those picks unless I get a massive offer. I would like to walk away with Caleb and Brooks, but realize that may not happen. I could draft them at 1.04 and 1.05 or try and trade back a bit to get them where they "should" be drafted. I know drafting BPA is wisest, but this is a shallow league so I want to make the right moves, in the right order.

Offer 1:
Give: Lawrence, Freiermuth, 1.05, 1.10 or R White
Get: Stroud, Olave, Ferguson
This would solidify my QB1 and get another solid young WR, as well as a slight upgrade at TE2. Giving up the 1.05 would be a WR if drafting BPA. The 1.10 or R White is the part of this deal I don't love. The Bucs drafted Bucky Irving in the 4th round, so I think White's role is pretty safe for this year. I'd like to think I'm a contender, so I'd prefer to keep him. The 1.10 is probably too late for Brooks. It'd probably be a WR or QB there.

Offer 2:
Give: D Smith, Spears
Get: Lamar, J Cook
This is half-assuming I go forward with offer 1 and have Stroud and Olave. Would you offer up Smith to have another top QB and reliable RB? It's unlikely I will need to start Smith much and Spears isn't going to start either. Or would you just draft Caleb and not even pursue either of these guys?

Offer 3:
Give: Etienne and 1.04
Get: Gibbs and 1.09
This is to tier up at RB and better utilize the pick. Brooks may be available at 1.09.

I know there is a lot in here, but I know you guys know your stuff and appreciate you taking the time to help out.

[NathanielWegman]

If you’re taking MHJ & Nabers at 1&2 I’d definitely move forward with offer #2.

I’m probably moving forward with offer #1 as well…

I’m higher on Etienne than most so offer #3 makes me hesitant but if you feel Gibbs is much better than Etienne then I’d make that deal also. I probably don’t make that deal but it’s not completely lopsided to where I wouldn’t make the deal

[Randomguess]

If you’re taking MHJ & Nabers at 1&2 I’d definitely move forward with offer #2.

I’m probably moving forward with offer #1 as well…

I’m higher on Etienne than most so offer #3 makes me hesitant but if you feel Gibbs is much better than Etienne then I’d make that deal also. I probably don’t make that deal but it’s not completely lopsided to where I wouldn’t make the deal

Thanks man. I love Gibbs long-term. I don't think he outscores Etienne by much if at all this year due to Monty. Offer 1 and 2 both feel like roster boosts for different reasons. Less risk for the picks in offer 1. Offer 2 is to help win now. Thanks again.

[moishetreats]

All 3?

[Randomguess]

All 3?

Would you do all 3?

[moishetreats]

All 3?

Would you do all 3?

Yup

[Miso_Neil]

I like all the trades.

[Randomguess]

All 3?

Would you do all 3?

Yup

Cool, appreciate it

[TheTroll]

Would you do all 3?

Yup

Cool, appreciate it

All of them

[killer_of_giants]

i like 1, at that point you don't need to go ahead with 2, then i also like 3.

[BigBawseRoss]

im 5050 on trade 1. trade 2 is a total pipe dream with no shot of being a reality for you or your team. despise trade 3 as 1.04 is worth more than either rb.